Tom Goddard
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Internal Medicine top 10%
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Papers in
-
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management 3
-
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 4
- Co-authors
- Lucas Brien Chartier (2 shared papers)Kirk D. Magee (2 shared papers)Brian R. Holroyd (2 shared papers)Amy H. Y. Cheng (2 shared papers)Suneel Upadhye (2 shared papers)Sam G Campbell (2 shared papers)Brian Hunter Rowe (2 shared papers)Devin R. Harris (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Stroke (4 papers)Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Tom Goddard
7 papers receiving 551 citations
Tom Goddard's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Rehabilitation 109
- Internal Medicine 55
- Epidemiology 333
- Neurology 82
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 96
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Goddard
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Goddard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Goddard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Goddard more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Goddard
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Goddard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Goddard. The network helps show where Tom Goddard may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Tom Goddard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations for Acute Stroke Management: Prehospital, Emergency Department, and Acute Inpatient Stroke Care, 6th Edition, Update 2018 Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 288 |
| 2 | 2015 | 160 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 5 | CanadianStrokeBestPracticeRecommendations: Hyperacute Stroke Care Guidelines, Update 2015 | 2015 | 19 |
| 6 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 4 |
About Tom Goddard
Tom Goddard is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Neurology, Epidemiology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 7 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (5 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (4 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (1 paper), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (1 paper) and Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (109 citations), Internal Medicine (55 citations), Epidemiology (333 citations), Neurology (82 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (96 citations). Tom Goddard has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lucas Brien Chartier, Kirk D. Magee, Brian R. Holroyd, Amy H. Y. Cheng, Suneel Upadhye, Sam G Campbell, Brian Hunter Rowe, Devin R. Harris, Andrew D. McRae and Christopher H. Hall. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Stroke and Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.