Tom Gillespie
Impact in
- Urban Studies top 0.5%
- Urban and Rural Development Challenges
- Urban Planning and Governance
- Finance top 5%
- Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Papers in
-
- Urban Planning and Governance 11
- Urban and Rural Development Challenges 8
- Finance 7
- Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism 7
- Co-authors
- Paul Watt (2 shared papers)Seraphim Dempsey (1 shared paper)Mel T. Devine (1 shared paper)Anne Nolan (1 shared paper)Seán Lyons (1 shared paper)Kate Hardy (2 shared papers)Seth Schindler (2 shared papers)Nicola Banks (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Urban Geography (2 papers)Review of African Political Economy (1 paper)International Journal of Urban and Regional Research (1 paper)Environment and Planning D Society and Space (1 paper)Health & Place (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Tom Gillespie
17 papers receiving 724 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Urban Studies 347
- Finance 92
- Business and International Management 16
- Development 28
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 94
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Gillespie
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Gillespie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Gillespie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Gillespie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Gillespie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Gillespie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Gillespie. The network helps show where Tom Gillespie may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Tom Gillespie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 201 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 148 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 105 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 61 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 48 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 40 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 14 | The Gandhi of Spatial Delight | 2007 | 1 |
| 15 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2026 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2025 | 0 |
About Tom Gillespie
Tom Gillespie is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Finance, Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Development, having authored 20 papers that have together received 780 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban Planning and Governance (11 papers), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (8 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (7 papers), Housing Market and Economics (3 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (3 papers), Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (1 paper), COVID-19 impact on air quality (1 paper) and Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (347 citations), Finance (92 citations), Business and International Management (16 citations), Development (28 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (94 citations). Tom Gillespie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Paul Watt, Seraphim Dempsey, Mel T. Devine, Anne Nolan, Seán Lyons, Kate Hardy, Seth Schindler, Nicola Banks, Diana Mitlin and Mustafa Kemal Bayırbağ. Their work appears in journals such as Urban Geography, Review of African Political Economy, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Environment and Planning D Society and Space and Health & Place.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.