Tom Everitt

813 citations
21 papers · 121 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Everitt

17 papers receiving 109 citations

Peers

Tom Everitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Health Informatics 5
  • Safety Research 30
  • Artificial Intelligence 56
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 21
  • Software 4
Replace Shruti Agarwal with:
Shruti Agarwal India
Nupur Soni India
Kanika Sharma India
Jaya Yadav India
Leilani H. Gilpin United States
Mesrob I. Ohannessian United States
Emilio Parisotto United States
Alison R. Panisson Brazil
Ameet Deshpande United States
Jack W. Rae United States
Tom Everitt relative to Shruti Agarwal India Shruti Agarwal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Shruti Agarwal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Everitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Everitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Everitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Everitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Everitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Everitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Everitt. The network helps show where Tom Everitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Tom Everitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Everitt Line = papers co-authored together Tom Everitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201822
2 202113
3 201612
4 20239
5 20169
6 20178
7 20157
8 20215
9 20155
10 20165
11 20175
12 20224
13 20154
14 20144
15 20223
16 20213
17 20232
18
Universal Induction and Optimisation: No Free Lunch
20131
19 20210
20 20240

About Tom Everitt

Tom Everitt is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research and Software, having authored 21 papers that have together received 121 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (7 papers), Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (6 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers), Game Theory and Applications (2 papers), Machine Learning and Algorithms (2 papers), Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications (2 papers) and Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (5 citations), Safety Research (30 citations), Artificial Intelligence (56 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (21 citations) and Software (4 citations). Tom Everitt has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Marcus Hütter, Eric Langlois, Ryan M. Carey, Ben Goertzel, Shane Legg, Pedro A. Ortega, Sebastian Farquhar, Alexey Potapov, Jonathan G. Richens and Ramana Kumar. Their work appears in journals such as Artificial Intelligence, Theory and Decision, Lecture notes in computer science, Studies in systems, decision and control and Proceedings of the Python in Science Conferences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact