Tom Emery

645 citations
28 papers · 404 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Emery

26 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

Tom Emery
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Demography 155
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 17
  • Gender Studies 101
  • Health 71
  • Sociology and Political Science 241
Replace Antonella Pinnelli with:
Antonella Pinnelli Italy
Juliet Stone United Kingdom
Marco Tosi Italy
Jesús J. Sánchez‐Barricarte Spain
Rachel Stuchbury United Kingdom
Jacques Légaré Canada
Donald T. Rowland Australia
Gijs Beets Netherlands
Glenn Sandström Sweden
Zuzanna Brzozowska Austria
Tom Emery relative to Antonella Pinnelli Italy Antonella Pinnelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Antonella Pinnelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Emery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Emery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Emery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Emery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Emery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Emery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Emery. The network helps show where Tom Emery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Emery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Emery Line = papers co-authored together Tom Emery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201855
2 201949
3 201645
4 202237
5 201836
6 201327
7 201924
8 201922
9 202222
10 201618
11 201612
12 201710
13 20229
14 20227
15 20157
16 20196
17 20214
18 20234
19 20232
20
Evaluating the quality of sampling frames used in European cross-national surveys
20172

About Tom Emery

Tom Emery is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Gender Studies, General Health Professions and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 28 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (12 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (9 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (5 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (5 papers), Global Health Care Issues (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (155 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (17 citations), Gender Studies (101 citations), Health (71 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (241 citations). Tom Emery has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anne H. Gauthier, Pearl A. Dykstra, Nardi Steverink, Jing Zhang, Aart C. Liefbroer, Nicole Hiekel, Tineke Fokkema, Stipica Mudražija, Marjolijn Das and Giorgio Piccitto. Their work appears in journals such as European Sociological Review, Demographic Research, PLoS ONE, Longitudinal and Life Course Studies and Social Science & Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact