Tom Dougherty

1.2k citations
33 papers · 439 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Dougherty

29 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Tom Dougherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • General Decision Sciences 44
  • Philosophy 177
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 177
  • Gender Studies 52
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 49
Replace Holly M. Smith with:
Holly M. Smith United States
Jennifer Whiting United States
Ivar R. Hannikainen Spain
Matthew D. Smith United Kingdom
Nathan Ballantyne United States
Chris Heathwood United States
John Deigh United States
Rachel Joffe Falmagne United States
Michael Ridge United Kingdom
Allan Hazlett United States
Tom Dougherty relative to Holly M. Smith United States Holly M. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.4×
Holly M. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Dougherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Dougherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Dougherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Dougherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Dougherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Dougherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Dougherty. The network helps show where Tom Dougherty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Tom Dougherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Dougherty Line = papers co-authored together Tom Dougherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201551
2 201346
3 201140
4 198837
5 201526
6
Future-Bias and Practical Reason
201524
7 201521
8 201521
9 201318
10 201118
11 202017
12 201514
13 202113
14 202013
15 201811
16 20139
17 20198
18 20138
19 20137
20 20166

About Tom Dougherty

Tom Dougherty is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and General Health Professions, having authored 33 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Free Will and Agency (12 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (9 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (9 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (7 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Ethics in medical practice (6 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (5 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (44 citations), Philosophy (177 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (177 citations), Gender Studies (52 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (49 citations). Tom Dougherty has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sam Baron, Kristie Miller, Sophie Horowitz, Paulina Sliwa, Ruth H. Maki, Kathy Pezdek, Tony Whetstone and Michelle Madden Dempsey. Their work appears in journals such as Ethics, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophy & Public Affairs, Thought A Journal of Philosophy and Philosophical Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact