Tom Copeland
Impact in
- Finance top 2%
- Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Accounting top 2%
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Papers in
- Finance 5
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 3
- Capital Investment and Risk Analysis 3
-
- Financial Reporting and Valuation Research 3
- Co-authors
- Timothy J. Nantell (1 shared paper)Tim Koller (1 shared paper)Peter Tufano (1 shared paper)Alberto Moel (2 shared papers)Mark L. Frigo (1 shared paper)Todd McCallum (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Review of Accounting Studies (1 paper)Financial Analysts Journal (1 paper)Financial Management (1 paper)Labour / Le Travail (1 paper)The Journal of Finance (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Tom Copeland
9 papers receiving 845 citations
Tom Copeland's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Finance 471
- Accounting 415
- Strategy and Management 496
- Economics and Econometrics 284
- Management Information Systems 75
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Copeland
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Copeland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Copeland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Copeland more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Copeland
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Copeland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Copeland. The network helps show where Tom Copeland may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Tom Copeland, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. Hit paper breakdown → | 1991 | 689 |
| 2 | A real-world way to manage real options. | 2004 | 148 |
| 3 | 2004 | 43 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 40 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 9 | The role of expectations in explaining the cross-section of stock returns | 2003 | 1 |
| 10 | 1995 | 0 |
About Tom Copeland
Tom Copeland is a scholar working on Finance, Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 10 papers that have together received 954 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (3 papers), Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (3 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (3 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (2 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (1 paper), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (1 paper), Stock Market Forecasting Methods (1 paper) and Risk Management in Financial Firms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (471 citations), Accounting (415 citations), Strategy and Management (496 citations), Economics and Econometrics (284 citations) and Management Information Systems (75 citations). Tom Copeland has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Timothy J. Nantell, Tim Koller, Peter Tufano, Alberto Moel, Mark L. Frigo and Todd McCallum. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Accounting Studies, Financial Analysts Journal, Financial Management, Labour / Le Travail and The Journal of Finance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.