Tom Copeland
Impact in
- Finance top 2%
- Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Accounting top 2%
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Papers in
- Finance 4
- Capital Investment and Risk Analysis 3
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 2
-
- Financial Reporting and Valuation Research 3
- Corporate Governance and Management 1
- Co-authors
- Tim Koller (2 shared papers)Timothy J. Nantell (1 shared paper)Peter Tufano (1 shared paper)Alberto Moel (1 shared paper)R. H. Martin (1 shared paper)Mark L. Frigo (1 shared paper)Todd McCallum (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Financial Analysts Journal (1 paper)Financial Management (1 paper)Harvard business review (1 paper)Review of Accounting Studies (1 paper)The Journal of Finance (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomHong KongUnited States
In The Last Decade
Tom Copeland
10 papers receiving 798 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Finance 380
- Accounting 346
- Strategy and Management 490
- Economics and Econometrics 265
- Management Information Systems 93
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Copeland
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Copeland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Copeland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Copeland more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Copeland
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Copeland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Copeland. The network helps show where Tom Copeland may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Tom Copeland, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 652 | |
| 2 | A real-world way to manage real options. | 2004 | 145 |
| 3 | 2007 | 36 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 32 | |
| 5 | Biomechanical Modeling of the Forces Applied to Closed Incisions During Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. | 2016 | 31 |
| 6 | 2004 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 11 | |
| 9 | Give My Regrets to Wall Street | 2004 | 2 |
| 10 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 0 |
About Tom Copeland
Tom Copeland is a scholar working on Finance, Strategy and Management, Accounting, Economics and Econometrics and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 11 papers that have together received 950 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (3 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (3 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (2 papers), Corporate Governance and Management (1 paper), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (1 paper), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (1 paper), Insurance and Financial Risk Management (1 paper) and Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (380 citations), Accounting (346 citations), Strategy and Management (490 citations), Economics and Econometrics (265 citations) and Management Information Systems (93 citations). Tom Copeland has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tim Koller, Timothy J. Nantell, Peter Tufano, Alberto Moel, R. H. Martin, Mark L. Frigo and Todd McCallum. Their work appears in journals such as Financial Analysts Journal, Financial Management, Harvard business review, Review of Accounting Studies and The Journal of Finance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.