Todd Galbraith
Impact in
- Biomaterials top 10%
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Rehabilitation top 10%
Papers in
- Surgery 7
- Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 7
-
- 3D Printing in Biomedical Research 6
- Bone Tissue Engineering Materials 3
- Co-authors
- François A. Auger (11 shared papers)Laure Gibot (5 shared papers)Jacques Huot (1 shared paper)François Berthod (6 shared papers)Mihaela Skobe (2 shared papers)Bryan Kloos (1 shared paper)Dan Lacroix (2 shared papers)Suvendu Das (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Tissue Engineering Part A (3 papers)Biomaterials (2 papers)Materials (1 paper)Advanced Healthcare Materials (1 paper)Nature Protocols (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Todd Galbraith
16 papers receiving 480 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Biomaterials 144
- Rehabilitation 40
- Oncology 116
- Biomedical Engineering 208
- Surgery 173
Countries citing papers authored by Todd Galbraith
This map shows the geographic impact of Todd Galbraith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Todd Galbraith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Todd Galbraith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Todd Galbraith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Todd Galbraith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Todd Galbraith. The network helps show where Todd Galbraith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Todd Galbraith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 92 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 78 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 47 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 46 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 42 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 0 |
About Todd Galbraith
Todd Galbraith is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Biomaterials, Molecular Biology and Oncology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 487 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (7 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (6 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (5 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (3 papers), Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments (2 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (2 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (2 papers) and Lymphatic System and Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (144 citations), Rehabilitation (40 citations), Oncology (116 citations), Biomedical Engineering (208 citations) and Surgery (173 citations). Todd Galbraith has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include François A. Auger, Laure Gibot, Jacques Huot, François Berthod, Mihaela Skobe, Jacques Huot, Bryan Kloos, Dan Lacroix, Suvendu Das and Lucie Germain. Their work appears in journals such as Tissue Engineering Part A, Biomaterials, Materials, Advanced Healthcare Materials and Nature Protocols.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.