Toby E. Huff

46 papers receiving 584 citations

Peers

Toby E. Huff
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • History and Philosophy of Science 94
  • General Psychology 12
  • Political Science and International Relations 219
  • Sociology and Political Science 342
  • Philosophy 58
Replace Charles E. McClelland with:
Charles E. McClelland United States
Konrad H. Jarausch United States
Jean-René Tréanton France
C. John Sommerville United States
Christophe Charle France
Nannerl O. Keohane United States
Jonathan D. Spence United States
Jean-Antoine-Nicolas de Caritat Condorcet
Gérard Namer
Fred Kaplan United States
Toby E. Huff relative to Charles E. McClelland United States Charles E. McClelland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Charles E. McClelland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Toby E. Huff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Toby E. Huff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Toby E. Huff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toby E. Huff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Toby E. Huff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Toby E. Huff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Toby E. Huff. The network helps show where Toby E. Huff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Toby E. Huff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Toby E. Huff Line = papers co-authored together Toby E. Huff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003121
2 200386
3 199472
4 197552
5 199640
6 201033
7 199032
8 198529
9 199328
10 200327
11 198127
12 200625
13 198225
14 198924
15 201722
16 201419
17 198317
18
Globalization and the Internet : Comparing the Middle eastern and Malaysian experiences
200114
19 200214
20 198614

About Toby E. Huff

Toby E. Huff is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Education, having authored 58 papers that have together received 815 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (8 papers), Islamic Studies and History (7 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (6 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers), Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (5 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (5 papers), History of Science and Medicine (5 papers) and Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (94 citations), General Psychology (12 citations), Political Science and International Relations (219 citations), Sociology and Political Science (342 citations) and Philosophy (58 citations). Toby E. Huff has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Randall Collins, Sal Restivo, N. W. Storer, Edward A. Tiryakian, Robert Κ. Merton, Guy Oakes, Thomas Bürger, Ahmad Sadri, Bryan S. Turner and Saïd Amir Arjomand. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Society, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Journal of Early Modern History and Social Epistemology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact