Guy Oakes

75 papers receiving 928 citations

Peers

Guy Oakes
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • General Psychology 32
  • History and Philosophy of Science 121
  • Sociology and Political Science 761
  • Philosophy 149
  • Political Science and International Relations 269
Replace John Patrick Diggins with:
John Patrick Diggins United States
Thomas L. Haskell United States
Bruce Mazlish United States
Werner Stark United States
Melvin Richter United States
Louis Menand United States
David Kettler United States
Leo Rauch United States
D E B Pollard United Kingdom
Alan Ryan United Kingdom
Guy Oakes relative to John Patrick Diggins United States John Patrick Diggins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
John Patrick Diggins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Guy Oakes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Guy Oakes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guy Oakes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guy Oakes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Guy Oakes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guy Oakes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guy Oakes. The network helps show where Guy Oakes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Guy Oakes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Guy Oakes Line = papers co-authored together Guy Oakes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976124
2
Roscher and Knies: The Logical Problems of Historical Economics
1975109
3 1978107
4 199286
5 198180
6 197863
7 198560
8 200351
9 198049
10 199046
11 197843
12 198839
13 199032
14
Essays on Interpretation in Social Science
197931
15 200126
16 198324
17 199423
18 200923
19 199122
20 197718

About Guy Oakes

Guy Oakes is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and History, having authored 86 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (23 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (18 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (12 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (10 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (8 papers), German Social Sciences and History (7 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (5 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (32 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (121 citations), Sociology and Political Science (761 citations), Philosophy (149 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (269 citations). Guy Oakes has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Max Weber, Susan Buck‐Morss, Nahid Aslanbeigui, Thomas Bürger, Charles Bambach, Georg Simmel, Paul Hirst, Francesca M. Cancian, David Zaret and Wilhelm Windelband. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, History of Political Economy, British Journal of Sociology and History and Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact