Tit‐Meng Lim

1.1k citations
33 papers · 726 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Tit‐Meng Lim

33 papers receiving 704 citations

Peers

Tit‐Meng Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Plant Science 176
  • Physiology 19
  • Biomaterials 53
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 64
  • Molecular Biology 205
Replace Zhihui Sun with:
Zhihui Sun China
Carl Scheffey United States
R. Reuss Germany
Hansol Lee South Korea
Yali Song China
Guoli Yin China
Neil A. Richardson Australia
Masashi Abe Japan
Tit‐Meng Lim relative to Zhihui Sun China Zhihui Sun's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Zhihui Sun · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tit‐Meng Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tit‐Meng Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tit‐Meng Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tit‐Meng Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tit‐Meng Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tit‐Meng Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tit‐Meng Lim. The network helps show where Tit‐Meng Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tit‐Meng Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tit‐Meng Lim Line = papers co-authored together Tit‐Meng Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200797
2 201271
3 201368
4 200563
5 201761
6 200247
7 199932
8 201031
9 200524
10 201421
11 201220
12 200019
13 201019
14 200816
15 201415
16 200014
17 199514
18 201314
19 199311
20 199711

About Tit‐Meng Lim

Tit‐Meng Lim is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Biomedical Engineering and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 33 papers that have together received 726 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multilevel Inverters and Converters (5 papers), Advanced DC-DC Converters (5 papers), Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (4 papers), HVDC Systems and Fault Protection (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (3 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (3 papers) and Induction Heating and Inverter Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (176 citations), Physiology (19 citations), Biomaterials (53 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (64 citations) and Molecular Biology (205 citations). Tit‐Meng Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chiang‐Shiong Loh, Prakash P. Kumar, S.J. Finney, Wendell Q. Sun, Qingsong Lin, B.W. Williams, Swee‐Hin Teoh, Grain Philip Adam, Wee Kee Tan and Zhiyuan Gong. Their work appears in journals such as IET Power Electronics, Scientific Reports, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, The FASEB Journal and Mechanisms of Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact