Timothy P. Schofield

622 citations
24 papers · 384 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Timothy P. Schofield

24 papers receiving 372 citations

Peers

Timothy P. Schofield
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Applied Psychology 75
  • Social Psychology 126
  • Clinical Psychology 96
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 58
  • Health 29
Replace Jerry Cullum with:
Jerry Cullum United States
Sally Zlotowitz United Kingdom
Oranit B. Davidson Israel
Dan Weijers New Zealand
Rachel Baumsteiger United States
Charles P. Nichols United States
Hidefumi Hitokoto Japan
Amy E. Rodrigues United States
Silvina Brussino Argentina
Jeong Min Lee United States
Timothy P. Schofield relative to Jerry Cullum United States Jerry Cullum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Jerry Cullum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Timothy P. Schofield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Timothy P. Schofield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timothy P. Schofield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timothy P. Schofield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Timothy P. Schofield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timothy P. Schofield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timothy P. Schofield. The network helps show where Timothy P. Schofield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Timothy P. Schofield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Timothy P. Schofield Line = papers co-authored together Timothy P. Schofield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011143
2 201543
3 201330
4 201523
5 202021
6 201819
7 201914
8 201814
9 201710
10 202210
11 20157
12 20207
13 20136
14 20186
15 20215
16 20215
17 20165
18 20224
19 20173
20 20153

About Timothy P. Schofield

Timothy P. Schofield is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (7 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (75 citations), Social Psychology (126 citations), Clinical Psychology (96 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (58 citations) and Health (29 citations). Timothy P. Schofield has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Thomas F. Denson, Peter Butterworth, Megan Oaten, Malte Friese, J. David Creswell, Aino Suomi, Nick Haslam, Katja Petrovic, Cassandra M. Chapman and Mark M. Schira. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, Basic and Applied Social Psychology and PeerJ.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact