Timothy Macklem
Impact in
- Law top 10%
- Legal principles and applications
- Law in Society and Culture
- Religious Freedom and Discrimination
-
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Papers in
-
- Legal Systems and Judicial Processes 2
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 2
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 2
- Law 4
- Legal principles and applications 3
- Criminal Law and Evidence 1
- Co-authors
- John Gardner (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Modern Law Review (2 papers)Utilitas (1 paper)Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (1 paper)Legal Theory (1 paper)King s Law Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Timothy Macklem
13 papers receiving 30 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Law 20
- Philosophy 8
- Health 6
- Political Science and International Relations 16
- Sociology and Political Science 20
Countries citing papers authored by Timothy Macklem
This map shows the geographic impact of Timothy Macklem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timothy Macklem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timothy Macklem more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Timothy Macklem
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timothy Macklem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timothy Macklem. The network helps show where Timothy Macklem may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Timothy Macklem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Faith as a Secular Value | 2000 | 10 |
| 2 | Compassion without respect? Nine fallacies in R. v. Smith | 2001 | 6 |
| 3 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 8 | No provocation without responsibility: A reply to Mackay and Mitchell | 2004 | 2 |
| 9 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 11 | Provocation and the Ordinary Person | 1987 | 1 |
| 12 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 1 |
About Timothy Macklem
Timothy Macklem is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Law, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 47 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal principles and applications (3 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (1 paper), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (1 paper), Criminal Law and Evidence (1 paper) and Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (20 citations), Philosophy (8 citations), Health (6 citations), Political Science and International Relations (16 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (20 citations). Timothy Macklem has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include John Gardner. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Law Review, Utilitas, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Legal Theory and King s Law Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.