Timothy Macklem
Impact in
- Law top 1%
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Legal principles and applications
- Law in Society and Culture
- Philosophy top 5%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- War, Ethics, and Justification
Papers in
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 3
- Legal Systems and Judicial Processes 3
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 2
- Law 6
- Legal principles and applications 4
- Religious Freedom and Discrimination 1
Timothy Macklem
19 papers receiving 175 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Law 109
- Philosophy 59
- Political Science and International Relations 104
- Cognitive Neuroscience 57
- Chemical Health and Safety 1
Countries citing papers authored by Timothy Macklem
This map shows the geographic impact of Timothy Macklem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timothy Macklem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timothy Macklem more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Timothy Macklem
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timothy Macklem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timothy Macklem. The network helps show where Timothy Macklem may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Timothy Macklem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Oxford handbook of jurisprudence and philosophy of law | 2002 | 175 |
| 2 | Faith as a Secular Value | 2000 | 11 |
| 3 | 2008 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 8 | |
| 5 | Compassion without respect? Nine fallacies in R. v. Smith | 2001 | 6 |
| 6 | 2001 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 9 | No provocation without responsibility: A reply to Mackay and Mitchell | 2004 | 3 |
| 10 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 13 | Provocation and the Ordinary Person | 1987 | 1 |
| 14 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 18 | Reasons, Reasoning, Reasonableness | 2002 | 1 |
| 19 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 1 |
About Timothy Macklem
Timothy Macklem is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Law, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 239 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal principles and applications (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (3 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (2 papers), Disability Rights and Representation (1 paper), Free Will and Agency (1 paper) and Religious Freedom and Discrimination (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (109 citations), Philosophy (59 citations), Political Science and International Relations (104 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (57 citations) and Chemical Health and Safety (1 citation). Timothy Macklem has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include John Gardner and John Gardner. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Law Review, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Utilitas, Legal Theory and King s Law Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.