Christopher Gane
Impact in
-
- Criminal Law and Evidence
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Papers in
-
- European Criminal Justice and Data Protection 3
- Artificial Intelligence in Law 1
- Law 4
- Legal principles and applications 2
- Comparative and International Law Studies 1
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations 1
- Jury Decision Making Processes 1
- Co-authors
- James Chalmers (2 shared papers)Eric Clive (1 shared paper)Raymond Arthur Smith (1 shared paper)Robin Hui Huang (1 shared paper)Fiona Leverick (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Revue internationale de droit pénal (1 paper)Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia) (1 paper)ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (2 papers)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Christopher Gane
7 papers receiving 19 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
- Law 9
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 1
- Political Science and International Relations 8
- Gender Studies 3
- Sociology and Political Science 11
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Gane
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Gane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Gane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Gane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Gane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Gane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Gane. The network helps show where Christopher Gane may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Gane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Criminal Procedure Systems in the European Community | 1993 | 7 |
| 2 | A casebook on Scottish criminal law | 1980 | 6 |
| 3 | A Draft Criminal Code for Scotland, with Commentary | 2003 | 3 |
| 4 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 5 | Managing the training function, using instructional technology and systems concepts; | 1972 | 2 |
| 6 | Partial Defences to Homicide in the Law of Scotland: A Report to the Law Commission for England and Wales | 2003 | 1 |
| 7 | 2001 | 1 |
About Christopher Gane
Christopher Gane is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Law, Sociology and Political Science, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 7 papers that have together received 22 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (3 papers), Legal principles and applications (2 papers), Comparative and International Law Studies (1 paper), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (1 paper), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (1 paper), Jury Decision Making Processes (1 paper), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper) and Artificial Intelligence in Law (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (9 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (1 citation), Political Science and International Relations (8 citations), Gender Studies (3 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (11 citations). Christopher Gane has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James Chalmers, Eric Clive, Raymond Arthur Smith, Robin Hui Huang and Fiona Leverick. Their work appears in journals such as Revue internationale de droit pénal, Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia), ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.