Tim Oakes

36 papers receiving 754 citations

Peers

Tim Oakes
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Geography, Planning and Development 113
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 27
  • Urban Studies 102
  • Political Science and International Relations 364
  • Demography 164
Replace John B. Allcock with:
John B. Allcock United Kingdom
Jørgen Ole Bærenholdt Denmark
Benjamin Forest Canada
Ruth Craggs United Kingdom
Robert V. Kemper United States
Andrew S. Merrifield United Kingdom
Eeva‐Kaisa Prokkola Finland
Walter E. Little United States
Erve J. Chambers United States
Mathis Stock Switzerland
Tim Oakes relative to John B. Allcock United Kingdom John B. Allcock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
John B. Allcock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Oakes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Oakes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Oakes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Oakes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Oakes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Oakes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Oakes. The network helps show where Tim Oakes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Tim Oakes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Oakes Line = papers co-authored together Tim Oakes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005219
2 200087
3 201272
4
Faiths on display : religion, tourism, and the Chinese state
201065
5 201560
6 202137
7 200637
8 199932
9 201229
10 201629
11 201728
12 200425
13 200621
14 201921
15 201919
16
Tourism in Guizhou: the legacy of internal colonialism.
199518
17 200914
18 201912
19 201911
20 202311

About Tim Oakes

Tim Oakes is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Urban Studies and Anthropology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 924 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (21 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (18 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (8 papers), Japanese History and Culture (7 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (5 papers), China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations (4 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (4 papers) and Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (113 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (27 citations), Urban Studies (102 citations), Political Science and International Relations (364 citations) and Demography (164 citations). Tim Oakes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Donald S. Sutton, Mary Mostafanezhad, Harng Luh Sin, Yu Liu, Alan August Lew, Alessandro Rippa, Louisa Schein, Claudio Minca, Kam Wing Chan and Michael A. Gentile. Their work appears in journals such as Eurasian Geography and Economics, The China Quarterly, The Journal of Asian Studies, Environment and Planning A Economy and Space and Environment and Planning D Society and Space.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact