Benjamin Forest

1.2k citations
36 papers · 784 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Benjamin Forest

36 papers receiving 673 citations

Peers

Benjamin Forest
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Urban Studies 116
  • Geography, Planning and Development 88
  • Space and Planetary Science 18
  • Social Psychology 229
  • Cultural Studies 85
Replace Steven D. Hoelscher with:
Steven D. Hoelscher United States
Denise Lawrence‐Zúñiga United States
Richard H. Schein United States
Stephen P. Hanna United States
Yujie Zhu Australia
Alex Jeffrey United Kingdom
Graeme Davison Australia
Torsten Malmberg
Steven High Canada
Michael Heffernan United Kingdom
Benjamin Forest relative to Steven D. Hoelscher United States Steven D. Hoelscher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Steven D. Hoelscher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Forest

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Forest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Forest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Forest more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Forest

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Forest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Forest. The network helps show where Benjamin Forest may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Forest, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Forest Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Forest links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002185
2 2004104
3 199585
4 201154
5 200842
6 200130
7 200427
8 201926
9 201823
10 201723
11
Placing the Law in Geography
200019
12 200417
13
Religion and Identity in Modern Russia: The Revival of Orthodoxy and Islam
200516
14 200515
15 201214
16 201213
17 201812
18 200812
19 201810
20 20248

About Benjamin Forest

Benjamin Forest is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies, Geography, Planning and Development and Law, having authored 36 papers that have together received 784 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (4 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (4 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers), Political Systems and Governance (3 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (3 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (3 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (116 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (88 citations), Space and Planetary Science (18 citations), Social Psychology (229 citations) and Cultural Studies (85 citations). Benjamin Forest has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Juliet Ellen Johnson, Karen E. Till, Mike Medeiros, Raja Sengupta, Patrik Öhberg, Shannon O’Lear, Christopher S. Sneddon, Majed Akhter, Kathryn Furlong and Sarah Moser. Their work appears in journals such as Political Geography, Urban Geography, Social & Cultural Geography, Environment and Planning D Society and Space and Cultural Geographies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact