Tim Boretius

27 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Tim Boretius
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.1k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 426
  • Polymers and Plastics 299
  • Biomedical Engineering 744
  • Neurology 103
Replace Thomas J. Richner with:
Thomas J. Richner United States
Andrés Canales United States
Florian Fallegger Switzerland
Nicholas B. Langhals United States
John L. Skousen United States
Sarah K. Brodnick United States
Abhishek Prasad United States
Martin Schüettler Germany
Sanghoon Lee South Korea
Kevin J. Otto United States
Tim Boretius relative to Thomas J. Richner United States Thomas J. Richner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Thomas J. Richner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Boretius

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Boretius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Boretius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Boretius more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Boretius

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Boretius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Boretius. The network helps show where Tim Boretius may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tim Boretius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Boretius Line = papers co-authored together Tim Boretius links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010373
2 2010344
3 2011168
4 201296
5 201180
6 201359
7 201143
8 202043
9 201230
10 201117
11 201516
12 201113
13 20149
14 20106
15 20126
16 20115
17 20125
18 20214
19 20103
20
A transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrode (TIME) to treat phantom limb pain:Towards human clinical trials
20122

About Tim Boretius

Tim Boretius is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering, Polymers and Plastics, Neurology and Neurology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (25 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (18 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (13 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (4 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (4 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (2 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (2 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (426 citations), Polymers and Plastics (299 citations), Biomedical Engineering (744 citations) and Neurology (103 citations). Tim Boretius has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Stieglitz, Christina Hassler, Xavier Navarro, Jordi Badía, Martin Schüettler, Ken Yoshida, Arán Pascual‐Font, David Andreu, Christine Coste and Winnie Jensen. Their work appears in journals such as Artificial Organs, Journal of Neural Engineering, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, MRS Bulletin and IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact