Peter Michael Wetherill
Impact in
-
- Narrative Theory and Analysis
- French Literature and Poetry
- French Literature and Criticism
- French Literature and Critical Theory
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 10%
- Comics and Graphic Narratives
Papers in
-
- French Literature and Poetry 4
- French Literature and Criticism 3
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism 1
- Historical and Literary Analyses 1
- Narrative Theory and Analysis 1
- Co-authors
- Patrick O’Neill (1 shared paper)Gustave Flaubert (3 shared papers)Clive Wake (1 shared paper)C. Barry Chabot (1 shared paper)Lawrence R. Schehr (1 shared paper)William J. Berg (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (11 papers)French Studies (1 paper)South Central Review (1 paper)Journal of European Studies (1 paper)Books Abroad (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter Michael Wetherill
10 papers receiving 71 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Literature and Literary Theory 75
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 11
- Cultural Studies 15
- Language and Linguistics 19
- General Arts and Humanities 2
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Michael Wetherill
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Michael Wetherill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Michael Wetherill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Michael Wetherill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Michael Wetherill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Michael Wetherill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Michael Wetherill. The network helps show where Peter Michael Wetherill may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Peter Michael Wetherill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 63 | |
| 2 | 1986 | 40 | |
| 3 | 1975 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1966 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 0 | |
| 15 | 1979 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1983 | 0 |
About Peter Michael Wetherill
Peter Michael Wetherill is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Classics, Anthropology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 131 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include French Literature and Poetry (4 papers), French Literature and Criticism (3 papers), Diverse Cultural and Historical Studies (1 paper), Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper), Translation Studies and Practices (1 paper), Historical and Literary Analyses (1 paper) and Narrative Theory and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (75 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (11 citations), Cultural Studies (15 citations), Language and Linguistics (19 citations) and General Arts and Humanities (2 citations). Peter Michael Wetherill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Patrick O’Neill, Gustave Flaubert, Clive Wake, C. Barry Chabot, Lawrence R. Schehr and William J. Berg. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, French Studies, South Central Review, Journal of European Studies and Books Abroad.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.