Tie‐Gen Chen
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
- Radical Photochemical Reactions
- Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
- Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Pharmaceutical Science top 10%
- Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Papers in
-
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods 8
- Radical Photochemical Reactions 5
- Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions 5
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms 2
- Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques 1
-
- Fluorine in Organic Chemistry 3
- Co-authors
- Phil S. Baran (5 shared papers)Tian Qin (5 shared papers)Benjamin Vokits (2 shared papers)Josep Cornellà (2 shared papers)Jacob T. Edwards (2 shared papers)Scott A. Shaw (2 shared papers)Jie Wang (2 shared papers)Laurin Wimmer (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition (3 papers)European Journal of Organic Chemistry (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)Organic Letters (1 paper)Chemical Communications (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaGermany
In The Last Decade
Tie‐Gen Chen
8 papers receiving 447 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Organic Chemistry 428
- Pharmaceutical Science 55
- Process Chemistry and Technology 11
- Inorganic Chemistry 46
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 19
Countries citing papers authored by Tie‐Gen Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Tie‐Gen Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tie‐Gen Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tie‐Gen Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tie‐Gen Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tie‐Gen Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tie‐Gen Chen. The network helps show where Tie‐Gen Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tie‐Gen Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 179 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 85 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 72 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 54 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2025 | 0 |
About Tie‐Gen Chen
Tie‐Gen Chen is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science, Pharmacology, Toxicology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 9 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (8 papers), Radical Photochemical Reactions (5 papers), Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (5 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (3 papers), Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (2 papers), Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques (1 paper), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (1 paper) and Organoselenium and organotellurium chemistry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (428 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (55 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (11 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (46 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (19 citations). Tie‐Gen Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Phil S. Baran, Tian Qin, Benjamin Vokits, Josep Cornellà, Jacob T. Edwards, Scott A. Shaw, Jie Wang, Laurin Wimmer, Pavel K. Mykhailiuk and Courtney Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, European Journal of Organic Chemistry, Nature, Organic Letters and Chemical Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.