Chloe E. Pitsch
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
- Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
- Radical Photochemical Reactions
- Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
- Pharmaceutical Science top 10%
- Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Papers in
-
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods 4
- Catalytic Alkyne Reactions 2
- Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions 2
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms 1
- Radical Photochemical Reactions 1
-
- Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis 2
- Co-authors
- Xiaotai Wang (5 shared papers)Yu Peng (1 shared paper)Hegui Gong (1 shared paper)Xuan Wang (1 shared paper)Guobin Ma (1 shared paper)Xiang Wang (2 shared papers)Yugen Zhu (2 shared papers)Yan‐Bo Wu (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Chemical Communications (1 paper)Angewandte Chemie International Edition (1 paper)Journal of the American Chemical Society (1 paper)Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (1 paper)Dalton Transactions (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaRomania
In The Last Decade
Chloe E. Pitsch
6 papers receiving 305 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Organic Chemistry 285
- Pharmaceutical Science 45
- Process Chemistry and Technology 13
- Inorganic Chemistry 59
- Pharmacology 12
Countries citing papers authored by Chloe E. Pitsch
This map shows the geographic impact of Chloe E. Pitsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloe E. Pitsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloe E. Pitsch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chloe E. Pitsch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloe E. Pitsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloe E. Pitsch. The network helps show where Chloe E. Pitsch may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Chloe E. Pitsch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 206 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 9 |
About Chloe E. Pitsch
Chloe E. Pitsch is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science, Process Chemistry and Technology and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 6 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (4 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (2 papers), Catalytic Alkyne Reactions (2 papers), Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (2 papers), Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (1 paper), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (1 paper), Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (1 paper) and Radical Photochemical Reactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (285 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (45 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (13 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (59 citations) and Pharmacology (12 citations). Chloe E. Pitsch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Romania. Frequent co-authors include Xiaotai Wang, Yu Peng, Hegui Gong, Xuan Wang, Guobin Ma, Xiang Wang, Yugen Zhu, Yan‐Bo Wu, Chi‐Yuan Cheng and Nan‐Nan Shen. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Communications, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research and Dalton Transactions.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.