Tia E. Keyes

7.4k citations
263 papers · 6.7k · h-index 42

Impact in

Papers in

Tia E. Keyes

255 papers receiving 6.6k citations

Peers

Tia E. Keyes
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Electrochemistry 905
  • Bioengineering 413
  • Materials Chemistry 2.7k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 713
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 935
Replace Hong Yang with:
Hong Yang China
Pall Thordarson Australia
Lawrence A. Bottomley United States
Jouko Kankare Finland
Shawn C. Burdette United States
Mengxiao Yu United States
Jason J. Davis United Kingdom
Johan F. J. Engbersen Netherlands
Yongdong Jin China
Imma Ratera Spain
Tia E. Keyes relative to Hong Yang China Hong Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Hong Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tia E. Keyes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tia E. Keyes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tia E. Keyes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tia E. Keyes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tia E. Keyes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tia E. Keyes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tia E. Keyes. The network helps show where Tia E. Keyes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tia E. Keyes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tia E. Keyes Line = papers co-authored together Tia E. Keyes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 263 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009425
2 2015346
3 2008131
4 2014108
5 201299
6 201793
7 200093
8 201492
9 201887
10 200984
11 200384
12 201582
13 201880
14 200680
15 201679
16 201175
17 200973
18 201368
19 199867
20 200066

About Tia E. Keyes

Tia E. Keyes is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Electrochemistry, having authored 263 papers that have together received 6.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (65 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (52 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (37 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (33 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (28 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (26 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (25 papers) and Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (25 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (905 citations), Bioengineering (413 citations), Materials Chemistry (2.7k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (713 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (935 citations). Tia E. Keyes has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Forster, Paolo Bertoncello, Alan M. Bond, Aisling Byrne, Johannes G. Vos, Christopher S. Burke, James J. Walsh, Lynn Dennany, Aaron Martin and Elaine Spain. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Communications, Langmuir, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, The Analyst and Electrochemistry Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact