Thomas Wilms

780 citations
30 papers · 585 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Wilms

29 papers receiving 555 citations

Peers

Thomas Wilms
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Ecological Modeling 293
  • Global and Planetary Change 398
  • Genetics 262
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 106
  • Paleontology 62
Replace Boris S. Tuniyev with:
Boris S. Tuniyev Russia
Marius Burger South Africa
Fèlix Amat Spain
Wichase Khonsue Thailand
Morris Flecks Germany
Nazan Üzüm Türkiye
Andreia Miraldo Finland
José J. Núñez Chile
Raquel Vasconcelos Portugal
István Sas Romania
Thomas Wilms relative to Boris S. Tuniyev Russia Boris S. Tuniyev's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Boris S. Tuniyev · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Wilms

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Wilms's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Wilms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Wilms more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Wilms

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Wilms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Wilms. The network helps show where Thomas Wilms may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Wilms, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Wilms Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Wilms links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201568
2 201436
3 201636
4 201435
5 200534
6 201733
7 201133
8 201729
9 201629
10
Monitor Lizards: Natural History, Biology & Husbandry
199829
11 201125
12 201323
13 201123
14 200122
15 201622
16
Review of the taxonomy of the spiny-tailed lizards of Arabia (Reptilia: Agamidae: Leiolepidinae: Uromastyx)
200719
17 200717
18 201717
19 200114
20 201010

About Thomas Wilms

Thomas Wilms is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Genetics, Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 30 papers that have together received 585 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amphibian and Reptile Biology (22 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (11 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (9 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (3 papers), Turtle Biology and Conservation (3 papers) and Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (293 citations), Global and Planetary Change (398 citations), Genetics (262 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (106 citations) and Paleontology (62 citations). Thomas Wilms has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Schmitz, Salvador Carranza, Mohammed Shobrak, Wolfgang Böhme, Philipp Wagner, Pierre‐André Crochet, Philippe Géniez, Margarita Metallinou, Lukáš Kratochvíl and José Carlos Brito. Their work appears in journals such as Zootaxa, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Oryx, Zoologica Scripta and Organisms Diversity & Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact