Thomas Teo

2.6k citations
75 papers · 1.5k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Teo

67 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Thomas Teo
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • General Psychology 521
  • Social Psychology 647
  • Clinical Psychology 265
  • History and Philosophy of Science 64
  • General Health Professions 263
Replace Brent D. Slife with:
Brent D. Slife United States
Jill Gladys Morawski United States
Philip Cushman United States
Charles B. Guignon United States
Wilfred R. Bion
Sunil Bhatia United States
Julian Henriques United Kingdom
Rhoda Kesler Unger United States
Alan C. Elms United States
Lisa M. Blackman United Kingdom
Thomas Teo relative to Brent D. Slife United States Brent D. Slife's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Brent D. Slife · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Teo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Teo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Teo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Teo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Teo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Teo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Teo. The network helps show where Thomas Teo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Teo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Teo Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Teo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010225
2 2015135
3 2005134
4 200899
5 201874
6 201772
7 200264
8 201456
9 201850
10 201150
11
A Critical History and Philosophy of Psychology: Diversity of Context, Thought, and Practice
201442
12 200340
13
Philosophical concerns in critical psychology.
200938
14 200930
15 201327
16
Andere Deutsche : zur Lebenssituation von Menschen multiethnischer und multikultureller Herkunft
199425
17
Varieties of Theoretical Psychology: International Philosophical and Practical Concerns
200923
18 199822
19 201322
20 202221

About Thomas Teo

Thomas Teo is a scholar working on General Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (45 papers), Social Representations and Identity (29 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (15 papers), Community Health and Development (10 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies (6 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (521 citations), Social Psychology (647 citations), Clinical Psychology (265 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (64 citations) and General Health Professions (263 citations). Thomas Teo has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Malaysia and France. Frequent co-authors include Richard T. G. Walsh, Alexandra Rutherford, Paul H. D. Stenner, Cor Baerveldt, Dennis Charles Wendt, Louise Sundararajan, Rachel Sing‐Kiat Ting, Girishwar Misra and Jie Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Theory & Psychology, American Psychologist, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, History of Psychology and New Ideas in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact