Thomas Teo

2.5k citations
54 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Teo

50 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Thomas Teo
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • General Psychology 385
  • Social Psychology 493
  • Clinical Psychology 211
  • History and Philosophy of Science 39
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 20
Replace Jill G. Morawski with:
Jill G. Morawski United States
Sunil Bhatia United States
Christopher Bollas United Kingdom
Charles Guignon United States
Alan C. Elms United States
John D. Greenwood United States
Jerome Neu United States
George Devereux United States
Ludwin E. Molina United States
Ruth Leys United States
Thomas Teo relative to Jill G. Morawski United States Jill G. Morawski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Jill G. Morawski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Teo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Teo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Teo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Teo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Teo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Teo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Teo. The network helps show where Thomas Teo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Teo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Teo Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Teo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010197
2 2015108
3 200596
4 200882
5 201860
6 201747
7 201144
8 200244
9 201437
10 201835
11 200333
12
A Critical History and Philosophy of Psychology: Diversity of Context, Thought, and Practice
201431
13 201321
14
Philosophical concerns in critical psychology.
200920
15 201319
16 199817
17
Varieties of Theoretical Psychology: International Philosophical and Practical Concerns
200917
18 199817
19 200917
20 202215

About Thomas Teo

Thomas Teo is a scholar working on General Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (29 papers), Social Representations and Identity (19 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (10 papers), Community Health and Development (6 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers) and Critical Race Theory in Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (385 citations), Social Psychology (493 citations), Clinical Psychology (211 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (39 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (20 citations). Thomas Teo has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, India and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Richard T. G. Walsh, Wade E. Pickren, Cor Baerveldt, Paul Stenner, Dennis C. Wendt, Alexandra Rutherford, Jie Yang, Louise Sundararajan, Girishwar Misra and Rachel Sing‐Kiat Ting. Their work appears in journals such as Theory & Psychology, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, American Psychologist, Review of General Psychology and Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact