Thomas Standl

97 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Thomas Standl
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 385
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 225
  • Surgery 1.2k
  • Emergency Medicine 251
  • Cell Biology 362
Replace J. Modig with:
J. Modig Sweden
Peter Slinger Canada
Benny Dahl Denmark
Laurel Omert United States
E Lowenstein United States
O. Häbler Germany
U. Kreimeier Germany
Robert W. Vaughan United States
Peter Conzen Germany
Sandro Rizoli Canada
Thomas Standl relative to J. Modig Sweden J. Modig's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
J. Modig · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Standl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Standl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Standl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Standl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Standl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Standl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Standl. The network helps show where Thomas Standl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Standl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Standl Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Standl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018111
2 2002100
3 199690
4 200477
5 200367
6 199755
7 201852
8 201151
9 199951
10 200351
11 200450
12 199847
13 200546
14 199944
15 201139
16 200937
17 199734
18 200734
19 200334
20 199334

About Thomas Standl

Thomas Standl is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Cell Biology, having authored 99 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (52 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (30 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (24 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (15 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (14 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (9 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (8 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (385 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (225 citations), Surgery (1.2k citations), Emergency Medicine (251 citations) and Cell Biology (362 citations). Thomas Standl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Jochen Schulte am Esch, Stefan Wilhelm, André Gottschalk, Marc Freitag, Martín Schuster, Marc-Alexander Burmeister, Ernst-Peter Horn, Frank Schroeder, M. Freitag and E.‐P. Horn. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Anesthesiology, European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine and Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact