Thomas Später

919 citations
31 papers · 729 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

    • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 8
    • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques 5
    • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications 12

Thomas Später

31 papers receiving 717 citations

Peers

Thomas Später
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Biomaterials 288
  • Rehabilitation 111
  • Genetics 139
  • Surgery 385
  • Urology 48
Replace Zhengbing Zhou with:
Zhengbing Zhou China
Melanie R. Major United States
Yonghuan Zhen China
David R. Maestas United States
Drew Kuraitis Canada
Graham G. Walmsley United States
Derek Whelan Ireland
In‐Su Park South Korea
Shunan Ye China
Sacha Khong United States
Thomas Später relative to Zhengbing Zhou China Zhengbing Zhou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Zhengbing Zhou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Später

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Später's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Später with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Später more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Später

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Später. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Später. The network helps show where Thomas Später may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Später, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Später Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Später links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020115
2 202076
3 201674
4 201749
5 201845
6 201839
7 202034
8 202033
9 201627
10 201725
11 202025
12 201821
13 201721
14 201517
15 202215
16 202015
17 202012
18 202011
19 20218
20 20178

About Thomas Später

Thomas Später is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomaterials, Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Genetics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 729 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (12 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (8 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (7 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (5 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (5 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (5 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (5 papers) and Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (288 citations), Rehabilitation (111 citations), Genetics (139 citations), Surgery (385 citations) and Urology (48 citations). Thomas Später has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Matthias W. Laschke, Michael D. Menger, Florian S. Frueh, Cláudia Scheuer, Anna Blocki, Marisa Assunção, Sebastian Beyer, Dorsa Dehghan‐Baniani, Ruth M. Nickels and Maximilian M. Menger. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, European Cells and Materials, Journal of Tissue Engineering, Scientific Reports and Journal of Visualized Experiments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact