Thomas Später
Impact in
- Biomaterials top 5%
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Wound Healing and Treatments
Papers in
- Surgery 14
- Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 7
- Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques 5
- Biomaterials 10
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications 10
- Co-authors
- Matthias W. Laschke (27 shared papers)Michael D. Menger (25 shared papers)Florian S. Frueh (10 shared papers)Cláudia Scheuer (8 shared papers)Anna Blocki (2 shared papers)Marisa Assunção (2 shared papers)Dorsa Dehghan‐Baniani (1 shared paper)Sebastian Beyer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (5 papers)European Cells and Materials (4 papers)Journal of Tissue Engineering (2 papers)Marine Drugs (2 papers)Scientific Reports (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Thomas Später
31 papers receiving 764 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Biomaterials 269
- Rehabilitation 111
- Genetics 123
- Surgery 370
- Urology 41
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Später
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Später's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Später with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Später more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Später
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Später. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Später. The network helps show where Thomas Später may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Später, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 126 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 81 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 81 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 41 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 36 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 10 |
About Thomas Später
Thomas Später is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomaterials, Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Rehabilitation, having authored 31 papers that have together received 775 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (10 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (7 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (7 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (5 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (5 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (4 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (3 papers) and Bone Metabolism and Diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (269 citations), Rehabilitation (111 citations), Genetics (123 citations), Surgery (370 citations) and Urology (41 citations). Thomas Später has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Matthias W. Laschke, Michael D. Menger, Florian S. Frueh, Cláudia Scheuer, Anna Blocki, Marisa Assunção, Dorsa Dehghan‐Baniani, Sebastian Beyer, Ruth M. Nickels and Maximilian M. Menger. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, European Cells and Materials, Journal of Tissue Engineering, Marine Drugs and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.