Thomas Smits

456 citations
22 papers · 109 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Smits

15 papers receiving 94 citations

Peers

Thomas Smits
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Space and Planetary Science 15
  • Conservation 14
  • Geology 16
  • Literature and Literary Theory 21
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 35
Replace Jonathan Prag with:
Jonathan Prag United Kingdom
Julia Noordegraaf Netherlands
Marilena Alivizatou United Kingdom
Bethany Nowviskie United States
Martin Warnke Germany
Tula Giannini United States
Martha Nell Smith United States
Michael Segal Israel
Gail Levin United States
Tanja Säily Finland
Thomas Smits relative to Jonathan Prag United Kingdom Jonathan Prag's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Jonathan Prag · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Smits

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Smits's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Smits with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Smits more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Smits

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Smits. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Smits. The network helps show where Thomas Smits may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Smits, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Smits Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Smits links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201943
2 202114
3 202311
4 201911
5 20149
6 20216
7 20164
8
Towards Multimodal Computational Humanities. Using CLIP to Analyze Late-Nineteenth Century Magic Lantern Slides.
20212
9 20162
10 20222
11
Illustrations to Photographs: using computer vision to analyse news pictures in Dutch newspapers, 1860-1940.
20171
12 20241
13 20211
14 20181
15 20201
16
Seeing History: Analyzing Large-Scale Historical Visual Datasets using Deep Neural Networks
20180
17 20210
18
Seeing History: The Visual Side of the Digital Turn
20180
19 20240
20 20240

About Thomas Smits

Thomas Smits is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Conservation, having authored 22 papers that have together received 109 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Humanities and Scholarship (6 papers), Photography and Visual Culture (4 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (3 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (3 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (2 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (2 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (2 papers) and Philippine History and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (15 citations), Conservation (14 citations), Geology (16 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (21 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (35 citations). Thomas Smits has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mike Kestemont, Paul Fyfe, Benjamin P. Warner and Samuel Merrill. Their work appears in journals such as Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, Journal of Historical Geography, Victorian periodicals review, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications and New Media & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact