Thomas Schubert

84 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Thomas Schubert
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Catalysis 1.5k
  • Filtration and Separation 137
  • Electrochemistry 395
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 239
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 682
Replace Rico E. Del Sesto with:
Rico E. Del Sesto United States
Xueyan Zhao China
Zhi‐Wu Yu China
Xiao Chen China
Dheeraj K. Singh India
Fabrizio Lo Celso Italy
Grant B. Webber Australia
Hemant K. Kashyap India
Masashi Yamamoto Japan
Xia Xin China
Thomas Schubert relative to Rico E. Del Sesto United States Rico E. Del Sesto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Rico E. Del Sesto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Schubert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Schubert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Schubert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Schubert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Schubert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Schubert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Schubert. The network helps show where Thomas Schubert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Schubert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Schubert Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Schubert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007238
2 2007185
3 2015152
4 2002128
5 2010115
6 2013104
7 2010104
8 200786
9 201183
10 200280
11 201278
12 201873
13 201572
14 201470
15 201066
16 201465
17 201864
18 201562
19 201362
20 201461

About Thomas Schubert

Thomas Schubert is a scholar working on Catalysis, Molecular Biology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Organic Chemistry and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 85 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ionic liquids properties and applications (40 papers), Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication (16 papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (11 papers), Advanced battery technologies research (9 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (9 papers), CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts (8 papers), Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (7 papers) and Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (1.5k citations), Filtration and Separation (137 citations), Electrochemistry (395 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (239 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (682 citations). Thomas Schubert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Ingo Krossing, John M. Slattery, Paul J. Dyson, C. Daguenet, Boyan Iliev, David Aradilla, Werner Hummel, Michael Müller, P. Gentile and Gérard Bidan. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Tetrahedron and RSC Advances.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact