Thomas Schmelter

44 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Thomas Schmelter
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Ophthalmology 456
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 374
  • Reproductive Medicine 105
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 246
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 62
Replace Wei Hong with:
Wei Hong China
Haijuan Gu China
Eriko Sumi Japan
Luíz Henrique Gebrim Brazil
Paul Canning United Kingdom
William B. Wong United States
Ashish Sharma United States
Jonghyeon Kim United States
Thomas Schmelter relative to Wei Hong China Wei Hong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Wei Hong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Schmelter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Schmelter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Schmelter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Schmelter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Schmelter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Schmelter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Schmelter. The network helps show where Thomas Schmelter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Schmelter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Schmelter Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Schmelter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012305
2 2013106
3 201593
4 202152
5 200249
6 201841
7 201640
8 201539
9 200632
10 201129
11 202125
12 201323
13 201422
14 200721
15 201218
16 201517
17 201316
18 201015
19 202214
20 201314

About Thomas Schmelter

Thomas Schmelter is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (13 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (11 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (7 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (6 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (5 papers), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (5 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (5 papers) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (456 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (374 citations), Reproductive Medicine (105 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (246 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (62 citations). Thomas Schmelter has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Kristina Gemzell‐Danielsson, K. Rosén, Oliver Zeitz, David S. Boyer, Rupert Sandbrink, Robert Vitti, Dan Apter, Anita L. Nelson, Alyson J. Berliner and Christoph Gerlinger. Their work appears in journals such as Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society, Climacteric, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact