Brigitte Stemper

3.0k citations
61 papers · 2.2k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Brigitte Stemper

58 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Brigitte Stemper
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Ophthalmology 672
  • Neurology 424
  • Physiology 544
  • Neurology 112
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 293
Replace Clare L. Fraser with:
Clare L. Fraser Australia
Kenneth S. Schwartz United States
François‐Xavier Borruat Switzerland
Dean M. Cestari United States
D. De Grandis Italy
Robert L. Tomsak United States
Geoffrey Woodruff United Kingdom
R. H. Lye United Kingdom
Genjiro Hirose Japan
Puiu Nisipeanu Israel
Brigitte Stemper relative to Clare L. Fraser Australia Clare L. Fraser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Clare L. Fraser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brigitte Stemper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brigitte Stemper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brigitte Stemper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brigitte Stemper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brigitte Stemper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brigitte Stemper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brigitte Stemper. The network helps show where Brigitte Stemper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brigitte Stemper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brigitte Stemper Line = papers co-authored together Brigitte Stemper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013222
2 2014220
3 2015163
4 2003149
5 2004147
6 2002127
7 199984
8 200484
9
Bone-subtraction CT angiography for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms.
200678
10 200068
11 201359
12 200357
13 199954
14 201251
15 200648
16 201844
17 199941
18 200335
19 199635
20 200234

About Brigitte Stemper

Brigitte Stemper is a scholar working on Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Physiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 61 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hereditary Neurological Disorders (10 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (10 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (8 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (6 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (6 papers), Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (5 papers), Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders (4 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (672 citations), Neurology (424 citations), Physiology (544 citations), Neurology (112 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (293 citations). Brigitte Stemper has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Max J. Hilz, Mirosław Bryś, Felicia B. Axelrod, H. Marthol, Edwin H. Kolodny, Oliver Zeitz, Robert Vitti, Matthias Dütsch, Rupert Sandbrink and T. Haendl. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Journal, Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Journal of Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact