Thomas Scheck

18 papers receiving 753 citations

Peers

Thomas Scheck
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 301
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 164
  • Emergency Medicine 140
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 75
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 99
Replace Claudio Bruschi with:
Claudio Bruschi Italy
Vasiliki Gerovasili Greece
J. Andrzejowski United Kingdom
C Rampulla Italy
Ian R. Rogers Australia
A. I. Hyman United States
Karl‐Axel Ängquist Sweden
Elisabeth Westerdahl Sweden
Piero Ceriana Italy
Renate Barker Austria
Thomas Scheck relative to Claudio Bruschi Italy Claudio Bruschi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Claudio Bruschi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Scheck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Scheck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Scheck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Scheck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Scheck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Scheck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Scheck. The network helps show where Thomas Scheck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Scheck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Scheck Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Scheck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2000181
2 2001126
3 200392
4 200166
5 200264
6 200149
7 200244
8 200343
9 200231
10 200324
11 200319
12 200316
13 200416
14 200215
15 200311
16 200210
17
[Consenting and declining patients for an intervention group after breast cancer surgery differ in terms of quality of life, coping and immunological functional assays].
20013
18 20031
19 20001

About Thomas Scheck

Thomas Scheck is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Complementary and alternative medicine and Surgery, having authored 19 papers that have together received 812 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thermal Regulation in Medicine (9 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (6 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (5 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (4 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (301 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (164 citations), Emergency Medicine (140 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (75 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (99 citations). Thomas Scheck has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Kober, Daniel I. Sessler, Klaus Hoerauf, Ozan Akça, Manfred Greher, Cem F. Arkiliç, Andrea Kurz, V. Goll, Burkhard Gustorff and Beatrice Birkenberg. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Anesthesiology, Anaesthesia and The Journal of Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact