Thomas Scheck

16 papers receiving 853 citations

Peers

Thomas Scheck
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 246
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 102
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 135
  • Emergency Medicine 68
  • Surgery 335
Replace Alexander Kober with:
Alexander Kober Austria
P Myllynen Finland
Franz X. Lackner Austria
Azita Moayeri United States
S. Kleinschmidt Germany
Ulf Hedstrand Sweden
Lars Berggren Sweden
Helmut Reinelt Germany
Julius H. Cranshaw United Kingdom
Po Tong Chui Hong Kong
Thomas Scheck relative to Alexander Kober Austria Alexander Kober's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Alexander Kober · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Scheck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Scheck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Scheck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Scheck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Scheck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Scheck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Scheck. The network helps show where Thomas Scheck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Scheck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Scheck Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Scheck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1999207
2 2000195
3 2001125
4 200397
5 200179
6 200267
7 200345
8 200231
9 200330
10 200219
11 200419
12 200317
13 200312
14 20017
15
[Consenting and declining patients for an intervention group after breast cancer surgery differ in terms of quality of life, coping and immunological functional assays].
20014
16 20033

About Thomas Scheck

Thomas Scheck is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Surgery, Complementary and alternative medicine and Oncology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 957 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thermal Regulation in Medicine (4 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (4 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (3 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (2 papers), Surgical site infection prevention (1 paper) and Blood transfusion and management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (246 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (102 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (135 citations), Emergency Medicine (68 citations) and Surgery (335 citations). Thomas Scheck has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Daniel I. Sessler, Alexander Kober, Ozan Akça, Andrea M. Kurz, Cem F. Arkiliç, Klaus H. Hoerauf, Franz X. Lackner, Veronika Goll, Manfred Greher and Stephan Kapral. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, The Lancet, Anaesthesia and The Journal of Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact