Thomas Scheck

1.4k citations
19 papers · 868 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Scheck

18 papers receiving 784 citations

Peers

Thomas Scheck
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 290
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 132
  • Emergency Medicine 85
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 47
  • Surgery 192
Replace Elisabeth Westerdahl with:
Elisabeth Westerdahl Sweden
Renate Barker Austria
S. H. Rosenbaum United States
C Rampulla Italy
L. A. Fleisher United States
Luiz Alberto Forgiarini Brazil
Adriana Cláudia Lunardi Brazil
W. Windisch Germany
Afshin Gholipour Baradari Iran
Rosa Güell Spain
Thomas Scheck relative to Elisabeth Westerdahl Sweden Elisabeth Westerdahl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Elisabeth Westerdahl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Scheck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Scheck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Scheck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Scheck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Scheck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Scheck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Scheck. The network helps show where Thomas Scheck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Scheck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Scheck Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Scheck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2000195
2 2001136
3 200399
4 200169
5 200265
6 200154
7 200346
8 200245
9 200232
10 200324
11 200319
12 200417
13 200217
14 200317
15 200213
16 200312
17
[Consenting and declining patients for an intervention group after breast cancer surgery differ in terms of quality of life, coping and immunological functional assays].
20014
18 20033
19 20001

About Thomas Scheck

Thomas Scheck is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Surgery, Complementary and alternative medicine, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 868 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thermal Regulation in Medicine (6 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (3 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (2 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (290 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (132 citations), Emergency Medicine (85 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (47 citations) and Surgery (192 citations). Thomas Scheck has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Kober, Daniel I. Sessler, Klaus Hoerauf, Ozan Akça, Manfred Greher, V. Goll, Cem F. Arkiliç, Andrea Kurz, Burkhard Gustorff and Alexander Friedman. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Anesthesiology, The Journal of Urology and Anaesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact