Mechthild Neises

605 citations
50 papers · 378 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Mechthild Neises

42 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

Mechthild Neises
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Pharmacy 104
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 33
  • Clinical Psychology 78
  • Oncology 88
  • Applied Psychology 11
Replace Amelia J. Lake with:
Amelia J. Lake Australia
Sabina de Weerd Netherlands
Jemma Gilchrist Australia
Neil Love United States
Sabrina Jhanwar United States
Mona H. Osman Lebanon
Alicja Bator United States
Richard W. Seidel United States
C. Tannahill United Kingdom
Bonnie O. Wong United States
Mechthild Neises relative to Amelia J. Lake Australia Amelia J. Lake's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Amelia J. Lake · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mechthild Neises

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mechthild Neises's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mechthild Neises with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mechthild Neises more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mechthild Neises

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mechthild Neises. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mechthild Neises. The network helps show where Mechthild Neises may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mechthild Neises, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mechthild Neises Line = papers co-authored together Mechthild Neises links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Obesity stigma reduction in medical students.
1992124
2 200993
3 200522
4 200213
5 200211
6 200710
7 20118
8 20027
9 20067
10 19976
11 20176
12 20065
13 19775
14 19934
15 20044
16 20094
17 20073
18
[Consenting and declining patients for an intervention group after breast cancer surgery differ in terms of quality of life, coping and immunological functional assays].
20013
19 20063
20 20003

About Mechthild Neises

Mechthild Neises is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Oncology, Social Psychology and Cultural Studies, having authored 50 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (10 papers), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (9 papers), Health and Medical Studies (8 papers), Family Support in Illness (6 papers), Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (5 papers), Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (5 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (3 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (104 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (33 citations), Clinical Psychology (78 citations), Oncology (88 citations) and Applied Psychology (11 citations). Mechthild Neises has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. Frequent co-authors include H. Jean Wiese, Richard A. Jones, Jing Han, Peter Hillemanns, Peruka Neumaier-Wagner, Brigitte Leeners, Werner Rath, Francesca Navratil, F. Melchert and Siegfried Geyer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, European Journal of Cancer, Breast Care and Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact