Thomas S. Ray

2.6k citations
66 papers · 1.8k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas S. Ray

65 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Thomas S. Ray
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 384
  • Clinical Psychology 301
  • Biological Psychiatry 27
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 178
  • Toxicology 31
Replace Michael Davison with:
Michael Davison New Zealand
David E. Presti United States
Jonathan Young United Kingdom
Randy L. Smith United States
Mark A. Frye United States
Peter Pütz Austria
Giovanni Petri Italy
Eric W. Holman United States
Clark Jeffries United States
Jakob Heinzle Germany
Thomas S. Ray relative to Michael Davison New Zealand Michael Davison's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.2×
Michael Davison · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas S. Ray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas S. Ray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas S. Ray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas S. Ray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas S. Ray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas S. Ray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas S. Ray. The network helps show where Thomas S. Ray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas S. Ray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas S. Ray Line = papers co-authored together Thomas S. Ray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010230
2 2000207
3 1993133
4 197598
5 201893
6 200577
7 199469
8 199261
9 199357
10 196349
11 201049
12 199240
13
Is It Alive or Is It GA
199139
14 199038
15 198035
16 198732
17 198729
18 202427
19 196727
20 198725

About Thomas S. Ray

Thomas S. Ray is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Mechanical Engineering and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (13 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (13 papers), Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications (10 papers), Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (10 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Origins and Evolution of Life (6 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (384 citations), Clinical Psychology (301 citations), Biological Psychiatry (27 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (178 citations) and Toxicology (31 citations). Thomas S. Ray has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and France. Frequent co-authors include Donald R. Strong, Ivan Tanev, Andrzej Buller, Mervin L. Clark, Christoph Adami, David Green, Mark A. Bedau, Norman H. Packard, John S. McCaskill and Kunihiko Kaneko. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Botany, Artificial Life, Complexity, Psychosomatic Medicine and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact