Michael O’Shea

7.8k citations
150 papers · 6.6k · h-index 45

Impact in

Papers in

Michael O’Shea

146 papers receiving 6.2k citations

Peers

Michael O’Shea
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 4.3k
  • Insect Science 1.0k
  • Aging 119
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 369
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.0k
Replace J. Douglas Armstrong with:
J. Douglas Armstrong United Kingdom
Edward A. Kravitz United States
Eric A. Stone United States
Ann‐Shyn Chiang Taiwan
Gero Miesenböck United States
R. Meldrum Robertson Canada
Naweed I. Syed Canada
Yi Zhong China
Stefan R. Pulver United States
Barry Ganetzky United States
Michael O’Shea relative to J. Douglas Armstrong United Kingdom J. Douglas Armstrong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
J. Douglas Armstrong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael O’Shea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael O’Shea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael O’Shea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael O’Shea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael O’Shea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael O’Shea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael O’Shea. The network helps show where Michael O’Shea may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael O’Shea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael O’Shea Line = papers co-authored together Michael O’Shea links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 150 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978408
2 1977291
3 1999240
4 1974208
5 1983208
6 1984207
7 1995165
8 1981163
9 1985149
10 2002141
11 1993137
12 2002130
13 1982123
14 1984122
15 1995116
16 1998113
17 1979111
18 1983108
19 2000100
20 199899

About Michael O’Shea

Michael O’Shea is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Ecology, having authored 150 papers that have together received 6.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (76 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (27 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (23 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (15 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (12 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (10 papers) and Insect Utilization and Effects (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (4.3k citations), Insect Science (1.0k citations), Aging (119 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (369 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (1.0k citations). Michael O’Shea has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Peter D. Evans, Michael E. Adams, Sergei A. Korneev, C. H. F. Rowell, Phil Husbands, Maurice R. Elphick, Paul R. Benjamin, György Kemenes, Ji Ho Park and Ildikó Kemenes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Experimental Biology, European Journal of Neuroscience, Current Biology and Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact