Thomas S. Freeman
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Susan Doran (4 shared papers)James Earl Mitchell (1 shared paper)Thomas H. Milby (1 shared paper)Kurt L. Wray (1 shared paper)David L. Smith (1 shared paper)Mark Greengrass (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Ecclesiastical History (3 papers)Sixteenth Century Journal (2 papers)The Journal of Popular Culture (2 papers)The Historical Journal (2 papers)Historical Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas S. Freeman
31 papers receiving 111 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- History 112
- Classics 38
- Religious studies 26
- Literature and Literary Theory 38
- Museology 9
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas S. Freeman
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas S. Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas S. Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas S. Freeman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas S. Freeman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas S. Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas S. Freeman. The network helps show where Thomas S. Freeman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Thomas S. Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 25 | |
| 2 | Religion and the Book in Early Modern England: The Making of John Foxe's 'Book of Martyrs' | 2011 | 21 |
| 3 | 2001 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 14 | |
| 6 | The Myth of Elizabeth | 2003 | 13 |
| 7 | 1969 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1964 | 6 | |
| 11 | Mary Tudor: Old and New Perspectives | 2011 | 5 |
| 12 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1977 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 19 | Some notes on a forgotten religion. | 1954 | 2 |
| 20 | 2007 | 2 |
About Thomas S. Freeman
Thomas S. Freeman is a scholar working on History, Classics, Literature and Literary Theory, Religious studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 38 papers that have together received 193 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (14 papers), Medieval Literature and History (8 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (8 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (6 papers), Irish and British Studies (5 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (5 papers), Early Modern Women Writers (4 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (112 citations), Classics (38 citations), Religious studies (26 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (38 citations) and Museology (9 citations). Thomas S. Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Susan Doran, James Earl Mitchell, Thomas H. Milby, Kurt L. Wray, David L. Smith and Mark Greengrass. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Ecclesiastical History, Sixteenth Century Journal, The Journal of Popular Culture, The Historical Journal and Historical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.