Thomas Romeas

26 papers receiving 495 citations

Peers

Thomas Romeas
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 140
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 212
  • Human-Computer Interaction 59
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 121
  • Biological Psychiatry 14
Replace Marcelo Bigliassi with:
Marcelo Bigliassi Brazil
Ashlee M. Hendy Australia
Benoı̂t Bolmont France
Jeremy C. Rietschel United States
Lawrence Warwick-Evans United Kingdom
Régis Thouvarecq France
Matthew A. Timmis United Kingdom
Tomohiro Kizuka Japan
Elmar Kal United Kingdom
Jochen Baumeister Germany
Thomas Romeas relative to Marcelo Bigliassi Brazil Marcelo Bigliassi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Marcelo Bigliassi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Romeas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Romeas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Romeas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Romeas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Romeas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Romeas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Romeas. The network helps show where Thomas Romeas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Romeas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Romeas Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Romeas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015202
2 200948
3 201947
4 201534
5 201033
6 201826
7 202219
8 201816
9 201713
10 202210
11 20239
12 20178
13 20237
14 20246
15 20215
16 20214
17 20154
18 20243
19 20232
20 20242

About Thomas Romeas

Thomas Romeas is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Social Psychology, Epidemiology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 31 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sport Psychology and Performance (16 papers), Sports Performance and Training (13 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (6 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (5 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (4 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (3 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (3 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (140 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (212 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (59 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (121 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (14 citations). Thomas Romeas has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Jocelyn Faubert, David Labbé, Ouissame Mnie‐Filali, Graciela Piñeyro, Sandra M. Boye, Nicolas Berryman, Guy Debonnel, Guillaume Lucas, Nasser Haddjeri and Benjamin Pageaux. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of sport and exercise, Journal of Sports Sciences, Frontiers in Psychology, Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine and The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact