David Labbé
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 1%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
- Food Science top 1%
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
Papers in
-
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 14
- Food Science 24
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 22
- Co-authors
- Nathalie Martin (20 shared papers)Andréas Rytz (8 shared papers)Nicolas Pineau (6 shared papers)Hendrik N.J. Schifferstein (2 shared papers)Anna Fenko (1 shared paper)Pieter Desmet (1 shared paper)Pascal Schlich (1 shared paper)Jocelyn Faubert (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Food Quality and Preference (13 papers)Appetite (4 papers)Nutrients (3 papers)Food Research International (2 papers)The Knee (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
David Labbé
60 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Sensory Systems 425
- Food Science 753
- Nutrition and Dietetics 573
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 304
- Marketing 182
Countries citing papers authored by David Labbé
This map shows the geographic impact of David Labbé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Labbé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Labbé more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Labbé
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Labbé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Labbé. The network helps show where David Labbé may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Labbé, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 202 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 189 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 108 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 85 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 83 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 83 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 81 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 76 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 65 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 57 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 55 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 52 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 49 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 47 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 45 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 40 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 37 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 35 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 33 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 31 |
About David Labbé
David Labbé is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Food Science, Human-Computer Interaction, Nutrition and Dietetics and Social Psychology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (22 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (14 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (14 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (10 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (9 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (8 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (7 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (425 citations), Food Science (753 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (573 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (304 citations) and Marketing (182 citations). David Labbé has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nathalie Martin, Andréas Rytz, Nicolas Pineau, Hendrik N.J. Schifferstein, Anna Fenko, Pieter Desmet, Pascal Schlich, Jocelyn Faubert, Thomas Romeas and Jacques A. de Guise. Their work appears in journals such as Food Quality and Preference, Appetite, Nutrients, Food Research International and The Knee.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.