Naomi Scheman

1.1k citations
25 papers · 305 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies 7
    • Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies 2
    • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 3
    • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 2

Naomi Scheman

23 papers receiving 203 citations

Peers

Naomi Scheman
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Philosophy 118
  • History and Philosophy of Science 24
  • Gender Studies 45
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 58
  • Sociology and Political Science 131
Replace Sabina Lovibond with:
Sabina Lovibond United Kingdom
Dorothea Olkowski United States
Alan D. Schrift United States
Andrew Ellis Benjamin Bulgaria
Margaret Atack United Kingdom
Mladen Dolar Slovenia
Wlad Godzich United States
Akeel Bilgrami United States
Horst Hutter Canada
Antoine Berman United States
Naomi Scheman relative to Sabina Lovibond United Kingdom Sabina Lovibond's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Sabina Lovibond · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Naomi Scheman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi Scheman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi Scheman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi Scheman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Naomi Scheman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi Scheman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi Scheman. The network helps show where Naomi Scheman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Naomi Scheman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Naomi Scheman Line = papers co-authored together Naomi Scheman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199696
2 198263
3 200026
4 201125
5
Is Academic Feminism Dead?: Theory in Practice
200018
6 201114
7 198812
8 199511
9 20165
10 19925
11 19955
12 20124
13 19894
14 20143
15 20203
16
Empowering canaries: Sustainability, vulnerability, and the ethics of epistemology
20142
17 19902
18 20181
19 19791
20 20001

About Naomi Scheman

Naomi Scheman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions and Information Systems and Management, having authored 25 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (7 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (3 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (2 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (2 papers), Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (2 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (118 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (24 citations), Gender Studies (45 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (58 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (131 citations). Naomi Scheman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Susan Moller Okin, Stanley Cavell, Newton Garver, Hans Sluga, Michael Kober, Steve Gerrard, Cora Diamond, David Bloor, David Stern and Thomas Ricketts. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Journal of Social Philosophy, The Monist, Critical Inquiry and Signs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact