Thomas Pyles
Impact in
- Linguistics and Language top 5%
- Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Multilingual Education and Policy
- Language and Linguistics top 2%
- Lexicography and Language Studies
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
- Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Papers in
-
- Lexicography and Language Studies 5
- Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity 4
- Linguistics and language evolution 2
- linguistics and terminology studies 1
Thomas Pyles
18 papers receiving 249 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Linguistics and Language 190
- Language and Linguistics 239
- Communication 49
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 56
- Literature and Literary Theory 36
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Pyles
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Pyles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Pyles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Pyles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Pyles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Pyles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Pyles. The network helps show where Thomas Pyles may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Pyles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1967 | 258 | |
| 2 | 1957 | 41 | |
| 3 | 1953 | 29 | |
| 4 | 1973 | 22 | |
| 5 | 1959 | 12 | |
| 6 | English: an introduction to language | 1970 | 12 |
| 7 | 1955 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1952 | 8 | |
| 9 | Problems in the origins and development of the English language | 1966 | 7 |
| 10 | 1957 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1953 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1963 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1955 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1961 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1973 | 1 | |
| 16 | Words and ways of American English : an authoritative account of the origins growth and present state of the English language in America | 1954 | 1 |
| 17 | Selected essays on English usage | 1979 | 1 |
| 18 | 1953 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1970 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1971 | 1 |
About Thomas Pyles
Thomas Pyles is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Classics and Linguistics and Language, having authored 23 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lexicography and Language Studies (5 papers), Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity (4 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (1 paper), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper), linguistics and terminology studies (1 paper) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (190 citations), Language and Linguistics (239 citations), Communication (49 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (56 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (36 citations). Frequent co-authors include Charles Barber, John Algeo, Donald Davie, Jack Windsor Lewis, Eric Partridge, Robert Burchfield and Robert A. Hall. Their work appears in journals such as American Speech, Language, Western Folklore, Shakespeare Quarterly and The Modern Language Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.