Thomas Prot

635 citations
14 papers · 473 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Prot

13 papers receiving 473 citations

Peers

Thomas Prot
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 338
  • Water Science and Technology 247
  • Pollution 95
  • Environmental Chemistry 57
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 25
Replace Dean Xiao with:
Dean Xiao China
Pete Pearce United Kingdom
Liuyi Pan China
Rourou Zhang China
Tianqiu Hong China
Zhijie Guan China
Xuetong Yang China
Roshan Prabhakar India
N. A. Booker Australia
MA Hongwen China
Thomas Prot relative to Dean Xiao China Dean Xiao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Dean Xiao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Prot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Prot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Prot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Prot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Prot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Prot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Prot. The network helps show where Thomas Prot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Prot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Prot Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Prot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2017113
2 202097
3 201985
4 202273
5 202131
6 202321
7 202215
8 202215
9 20249
10 20245
11 20244
12 20213
13 20252
14 20250

About Thomas Prot

Thomas Prot is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Water Science and Technology, Environmental Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 14 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phosphorus and nutrient management (11 papers), Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal (7 papers), Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment (4 papers), Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (2 papers), Membrane Separation Technologies (2 papers), Wastewater Treatment and Reuse (2 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (1 paper) and Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (338 citations), Water Science and Technology (247 citations), Pollution (95 citations), Environmental Chemistry (57 citations) and Geochemistry and Petrology (25 citations). Thomas Prot has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Leon Korving, Mark C.M. van Loosdrecht, A. Iulian Dugulan, K. Goubitz, Geert‐Jan Witkamp, Karel J. Keesman, Prashanth Suresh Kumar, Philipp Kuntke, D.J. de Ridder and Vivi Nguyen. Their work appears in journals such as Water Research, Journal of environmental chemical engineering, Chemical Engineering Journal, Water Science & Technology and Separation and Purification Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact