Pete Pearce

468 citations
12 papers · 383 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Pete Pearce

11 papers receiving 372 citations

Peers

Pete Pearce
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 188
  • Water Science and Technology 220
  • Pollution 126
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 23
  • Environmental Chemistry 37
Replace M. Ulmanu with:
M. Ulmanu Spain
I. Anger Spain
Liuyi Pan China
Faeiza Buyong Malaysia
Rourou Zhang China
Yiyi Deng China
Jinjia Huang China
Prabuddhi Wijekoon Sri Lanka
Jurandyr Povinelli Brazil
Roshan Prabhakar India
Pete Pearce relative to M. Ulmanu Spain M. Ulmanu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. Ulmanu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pete Pearce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pete Pearce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pete Pearce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pete Pearce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pete Pearce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pete Pearce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pete Pearce. The network helps show where Pete Pearce may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Pete Pearce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pete Pearce Line = papers co-authored together Pete Pearce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2016100
2 200596
3 200572
4 200851
5 201518
6 201116
7 200413
8 201711
9 20144
10 20231
11
Evaluation of Local and National Effects of Recovering Phosphorus at Wastewater Treatment Plants
20151
12 20230

About Pete Pearce

Pete Pearce is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Water Science and Technology, Pollution, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Surgery, having authored 12 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phosphorus and nutrient management (5 papers), Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal (5 papers), Membrane Separation Technologies (3 papers), Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment (3 papers), Water Treatment and Disinfection (2 papers), Water resources management and optimization (1 paper), Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies (1 paper) and Industrial Gas Emission Control (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (188 citations), Water Science and Technology (220 citations), Pollution (126 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (23 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (37 citations). Pete Pearce has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include Jia‐Qian Jiang, Eve Germain, Tom Stephenson, M. J. Bauer, Devendra Saroj, Jonathan Chenoweth, Roland Clift, Stephen Morse, Elise Cartmell and Ana Soares. Their work appears in journals such as Water and Environment Journal, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Journal of Environmental Management, Bioresource Technology and Waste Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact