Thomas Postlewait

619 citations
21 papers · 227 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Postlewait

15 papers receiving 89 citations

Peers

Thomas Postlewait
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Music 77
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 99
  • Literature and Literary Theory 77
  • Museology 13
  • Anthropology 28
Replace Jacky Bratton with:
Jacky Bratton United Kingdom
Peggy McCormack United States
James Naremore United States
James V. Hatch United States
John Henry Raleigh United States
George Bornstein United States
Robert G. O’Meally United States
Dan Shiffman United States
Betsy Erkkilä
Oscar G. Brockett United States
Thomas Postlewait relative to Jacky Bratton United Kingdom Jacky Bratton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Jacky Bratton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Postlewait

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Postlewait's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Postlewait with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Postlewait more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Postlewait

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Postlewait. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Postlewait. The network helps show where Thomas Postlewait may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Postlewait, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Postlewait Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Postlewait links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199063
2
The Cambridge Introduction to Theatre Historiography
200954
3 198625
4
Theatricality: An Introduction
200817
5 199117
6 198811
7
Victorian science and Victorian values
19817
8 19787
9 20046
10 19814
11 20074
12 20003
13 20172
14 19992
15 20102
16 20041
17 19841
18 20041
19 19810
20 20060

About Thomas Postlewait

Thomas Postlewait is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Music, Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 227 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theatre and Performance Studies (11 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (9 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Literature Analysis and Criticism (2 papers), History of Science and Natural History (2 papers), Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (2 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (1 paper) and Irish and British Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (77 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (99 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (77 citations), Museology (13 citations) and Anthropology (28 citations). Thomas Postlewait has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Bruce McConachie, Rosemarie K. Bank, Tracy C. Davis, James M. Paradis, William Shakespeare and Peter A. Davis. Their work appears in journals such as Theatre Journal, Theatre Survey, Twentieth Century Literature, Theatre Research International and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact