Thomas Pope

832 citations
22 papers · 683 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Pope

22 papers receiving 678 citations

Peers

Thomas Pope
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 272
  • Electrochemistry 50
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 455
  • Materials Chemistry 262
  • Biomedical Engineering 166
Replace Arunabh Batra with:
Arunabh Batra United States
Songjun Hou United Kingdom
Giacomo Lovat Italy
Oday A. Al‐Owaedi Iraq
Chunhui Gu China
Markrete Krikorian United States
Jan C. Hummelen Netherlands
Santiago Marqués‐González United Kingdom
Qusiy Al‐Galiby United Kingdom
Thomas Pope relative to Arunabh Batra United States Arunabh Batra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Arunabh Batra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Pope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Pope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Pope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Pope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Pope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Pope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Pope. The network helps show where Thomas Pope may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Pope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Pope Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Pope links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013291
2 201457
3 201553
4 201446
5 201942
6 201636
7 202026
8 201517
9 202214
10 201214
11 201412
12 201712
13 201811
14 202111
15 202410
16 20237
17 20246
18 20246
19 20184
20 20234

About Thomas Pope

Thomas Pope is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Molecular Biology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 22 papers that have together received 683 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (10 papers), Graphene research and applications (5 papers), Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research (3 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (3 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (2 papers), Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications (2 papers) and Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (272 citations), Electrochemistry (50 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (455 citations), Materials Chemistry (262 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (166 citations). Thomas Pope has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Iraq and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Colin J. Lambert, David Zsolt Manrique, Thomas Wandlowski, Martin R. Bryce, Murat Gülçür, Cancan Huang, Pavel Moreno‐García, Wenjing Hong, Veerabhadrarao Kaliginedi and Andrei S. Batsanov. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Materials Chemistry C, Chemical Communications, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Nano Letters and Crystal Growth & Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact