Thomas Pieper

525 citations
27 papers · 472 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization 3
    • Surfactants and Colloidal Systems 2
    • Metal complexes synthesis and properties 9

Thomas Pieper

27 papers receiving 455 citations

Peers

Thomas Pieper
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Oncology 215
  • Analytical Chemistry 60
  • Molecular Medicine 29
  • Organic Chemistry 172
  • Electrochemistry 22
Replace F. Dietze with:
F. Dietze Germany
R. S. Kumeev Russia
E C Gyarfas Australia
Eliška Skořepová Czechia
B. Venkatram Reddy India
David R. Alston United Kingdom
Tadashi Shiraiwa Japan
F. Paolo Cavasino Italy
B. Sethuram India
Barry Warwick Australia
Thomas Pieper relative to F. Dietze Germany F. Dietze's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
F. Dietze · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Pieper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Pieper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Pieper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Pieper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Pieper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Pieper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Pieper. The network helps show where Thomas Pieper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Pieper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Pieper Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Pieper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199991
2 200183
3 199954
4 199537
5 200131
6 200023
7 198919
8 199816
9 199515
10 199915
11 199613
12 200112
13 200012
14 19987
15 19987
16 19936
17 19986
18 19935
19 19995
20 19935

About Thomas Pieper

Thomas Pieper is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Oncology, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Polymers and Plastics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal complexes synthesis and properties (9 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (4 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (3 papers), Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (3 papers), Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (3 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (3 papers), Polymer crystallization and properties (2 papers) and Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (215 citations), Analytical Chemistry (60 citations), Molecular Medicine (29 citations), Organic Chemistry (172 citations) and Electrochemistry (22 citations). Thomas Pieper has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Bernhard K. Keppler, Wolfgang Peti, Joanna Szpunar, Ryszard Łobiński, René Wissiack, Erwin Rosenberg, Gerald Giester, Olga E. Philippova, H. G. Kilian and A. R. Khokhlov. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer Chemistry, Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, Thorax and Molecular Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact