Thomas Pieper

523 citations
24 papers · 422 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization 3
    • Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis 2
    • Metal complexes synthesis and properties 7

Thomas Pieper

24 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers

Thomas Pieper
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Oncology 196
  • Analytical Chemistry 57
  • Molecular Medicine 27
  • Organic Chemistry 150
  • Filtration and Separation 7
Replace F. Dietze with:
F. Dietze Germany
E C Gyarfas Australia
Barry Warwick Australia
Tadashi Shiraiwa Japan
David R. Alston United Kingdom
Samy M. Abu‐El‐Wafa Egypt
Ramesh Bembi India
B. Venkatram Reddy India
Hamidreza Samouei United States
S. Jeyavijayan India
Thomas Pieper relative to F. Dietze Germany F. Dietze's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
F. Dietze · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Pieper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Pieper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Pieper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Pieper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Pieper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Pieper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Pieper. The network helps show where Thomas Pieper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Pieper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Pieper Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Pieper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199987
2 200181
3 199950
4 199533
5 200129
6 200023
7 198919
8 199816
9 199514
10 199612
11 200011
12 200110
13 19986
14 19995
15 19985
16 19935
17 19934
18 19983
19 20002
20 20162

About Thomas Pieper

Thomas Pieper is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Oncology, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Polymers and Plastics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal complexes synthesis and properties (7 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (3 papers), Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (3 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (3 papers), Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (3 papers), Block Copolymer Self-Assembly (2 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers) and Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (196 citations), Analytical Chemistry (57 citations), Molecular Medicine (27 citations), Organic Chemistry (150 citations) and Filtration and Separation (7 citations). Thomas Pieper has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Bernhard K. Keppler, Wolfgang Peti, Ryszard Łobiński, Joanna Szpunar, Erwin Rosenberg, René Wissiack, Gerald Giester, Olga E. Philippova, Natalia L. Sitnikova and S. G. Starodoubtsev. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer Chemistry, Thorax, European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics and Macromolecules.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact