Thomas Patton
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 0.5%
- Wound Healing and Treatments
- Biomaterials top 5%
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Papers in
-
- Bee Products Chemical Analysis 2
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 3
- Co-authors
- James J. Brennan (4 shared papers)Jonathan Cooke (2 shared papers)Matthew Dryden (2 shared papers)John N. Barrett (2 shared papers)Nikolaos Theodoros Georgopoulos (1 shared paper)Christopher Dunnill (1 shared paper)David John Leaper (1 shared paper)John Barrett (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Quality of Life Research (2 papers)Addiction (2 papers)AIDS (1 paper)Value in Health (1 paper)International Wound Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Thomas Patton
16 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Thomas Patton's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Rehabilitation 587
- Biomaterials 266
- Occupational Therapy 73
- Drug Discovery 3
- Insect Science 212
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Patton
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Patton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Patton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Patton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Patton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Patton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Patton. The network helps show where Thomas Patton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Patton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and wound healing: the functional role of ROS and emerging ROS‐modulating technologies for augmentation of the healing process Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 1129 |
| 2 | 2005 | 144 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 73 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 0 |
About Thomas Patton
Thomas Patton is a scholar working on Insect Science, Economics and Econometrics, Epidemiology, Immunology and Allergy and Rehabilitation, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (2 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (1 paper), Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research (1 paper), Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments (1 paper), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (1 paper) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (587 citations), Biomaterials (266 citations), Occupational Therapy (73 citations), Drug Discovery (3 citations) and Insect Science (212 citations). Thomas Patton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include James J. Brennan, Jonathan Cooke, Matthew Dryden, John N. Barrett, Nikolaos Theodoros Georgopoulos, Christopher Dunnill, David John Leaper, John Barrett, Nils Gutacker and Richard Cookson. Their work appears in journals such as Quality of Life Research, Addiction, AIDS, Value in Health and International Wound Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.