Daniela Abramovitz

2.2k citations
67 papers · 1.5k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Abramovitz

65 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Daniela Abramovitz
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Infectious Diseases 690
  • Epidemiology 1.2k
  • Toxicology 71
  • Sociology and Political Science 775
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 374
Replace Alicia Vera with:
Alicia Vera United States
Natalia Bobrova United Kingdom
Christopher S. Murrill United States
Abu Abdul-Quader United States
Rebeca Ramos United States
Courtney McKnight United States
Milagros Sandoval United States
Babak Moazen Iran
María José Belza Spain
Benny Jose United States
Daniela Abramovitz relative to Alicia Vera United States Alicia Vera's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Alicia Vera · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Abramovitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Abramovitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Abramovitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Abramovitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Abramovitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Abramovitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Abramovitz. The network helps show where Daniela Abramovitz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Abramovitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Abramovitz Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Abramovitz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008142
2 2008110
3 200983
4 201280
5 201374
6 201171
7 200958
8 202149
9 201247
10 201542
11 202141
12 201241
13 201037
14 201236
15 201535
16 201731
17 201830
18 201730
19 202129
20 201927

About Daniela Abramovitz

Daniela Abramovitz is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Sociology and Political Science, Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (57 papers), Sex work and related issues (27 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (24 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (21 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (6 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (5 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (4 papers) and SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (690 citations), Epidemiology (1.2k citations), Toxicology (71 citations), Sociology and Political Science (775 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (374 citations). Daniela Abramovitz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Steffanie A. Strathdee, Thomas L. Patterson, Alicia Vera, Gudelia Rangel, Remedios Lozada, Carlos Magis‐Rodríguez, Shirley J. Semple, Leo Beletsky, Gustavo Martı́nez and Hugo Staines. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Drug Policy, AIDS and Behavior, BMC Public Health, BMJ Open and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact