Thomas Otto

22 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Thomas Otto
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Catalysis 78
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 28
  • Biomedical Engineering 215
  • Water Science and Technology 60
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 66
Replace Zhilei Zhang with:
Zhilei Zhang China
Chang Tan China
Ben Petrovic United Kingdom
Orlando F. Cruz Brazil
Giuseppe Conte Italy
Zhigang Shen China
Byung Wook Hwang South Korea
N. Álvarez-Gutiérrez Spain
Azra Nawar Pakistan
Çerağ Dilek Türkiye
Thomas Otto relative to Zhilei Zhang China Zhilei Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Zhilei Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Otto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Otto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Otto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Otto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Otto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Otto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Otto. The network helps show where Thomas Otto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Otto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Otto Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Otto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016135
2 202252
3 201549
4 201842
5 201838
6 202033
7 202324
8 201817
9 202011
10 202010
11 202010
12 20198
13 20237
14 20215
15 20133
16 20113
17 20152
18 20092
19 20091
20 20191

About Thomas Otto

Thomas Otto is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Catalysis and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 24 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies (7 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (7 papers), Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis (6 papers), Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (5 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (4 papers), Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication (4 papers), Catalysis for Biomass Conversion (4 papers) and Catalysts for Methane Reforming (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (78 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (28 citations), Biomedical Engineering (215 citations), Water Science and Technology (60 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (66 citations). Thomas Otto has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Catalina Rodríguez Correa, Andrea Kruse, Jörg Sauer, Thomas A. Zevaco, Klaus Raffelt, Jan‐Dierk Grunwaldt, Nicolaus Dahmen, Stephan Pitter, Stefan Kaskel and Julia Grothe. Their work appears in journals such as Chemie Ingenieur Technik, Biomass and Bioenergy, Materials Advances, Chemistry of Materials and Carbon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact