Thomas O’Brien

4.2k citations
44 papers · 2.3k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas O’Brien

40 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Thomas O’Brien
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 345
  • Physiology 168
  • Aging 45
  • Molecular Biology 1.6k
  • Oncology 488
Replace Jo Milner with:
Jo Milner United Kingdom
Jill R. Donigian United States
Fulai Jin United States
Joseph W. Landry United States
Tzuling Cheng United States
Petra Beli Germany
Mirit I. Aladjem United States
Sharon Sweitzer United States
Ralph Imhof Switzerland
Dorte B. Bekker‐Jensen Denmark
Thomas O’Brien relative to Jo Milner United Kingdom Jo Milner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Jo Milner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas O’Brien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas O’Brien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas O’Brien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas O’Brien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas O’Brien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas O’Brien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas O’Brien. The network helps show where Thomas O’Brien may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas O’Brien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas O’Brien Line = papers co-authored together Thomas O’Brien links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994294
2 2015202
3 2018194
4 1993136
5 1991109
6 2009108
7 200799
8 199591
9 199578
10 201671
11 201465
12 201364
13 201360
14 201459
15 200056
16 201348
17 199848
18 198447
19 201347
20 199346

About Thomas O’Brien

Thomas O’Brien is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Oncology, Epidemiology and Physiology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (13 papers), PARP inhibition in cancer therapy (10 papers), Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism (6 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (6 papers), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (6 papers), Heat shock proteins research (6 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (5 papers) and Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (345 citations), Physiology (168 citations), Aging (45 citations), Molecular Biology (1.6k citations) and Oncology (488 citations). Thomas O’Brien has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include John T. Lis, Robert Tjian, Arno L. Greenleaf, S. E. Hardin, Deepak Sampath, Adam G. Eldridge, Peter S. Dragovich, Tanja S. Zabka, Dinah Misner and Yang Xiao. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular and Cellular Biology, Cancer Research, Neoplasia, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact