Thomas Nowell
Impact in
- Aging top 10%
- Clinical Biochemistry top 5%
- Advanced Glycation End Products research
Papers in
-
- Advanced Glycation End Products research 5
- Aging 3
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms 3
- Co-authors
- Allen Taylor (16 shared papers)Fu Shang (9 shared papers)Martin S. Obin (4 shared papers)Xin Gong (6 shared papers)Jessica Jahngen-Hodge (3 shared papers)Jeffrey B. Blumberg (2 shared papers)Helen J. Palmer (1 shared paper)Li Peng Huang (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Experimental Eye Research (4 papers)Mechanisms of Ageing and Development (3 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (2 papers)Current Eye Research (2 papers)Advances in pharmacology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChileAustralia
In The Last Decade
Thomas Nowell
17 papers receiving 849 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Aging 38
- Clinical Biochemistry 131
- Cell Biology 190
- Molecular Biology 679
- Ophthalmology 79
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Nowell
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Nowell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Nowell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Nowell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Nowell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Nowell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Nowell. The network helps show where Thomas Nowell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Nowell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 242 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 105 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 82 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 76 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 56 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 54 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 48 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 43 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 37 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 26 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 22 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 17 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 14 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 10 | |
| 17 | Oxidative stress and ascorbate in relation to risk for cataract and age-related maculopathy. | 1997 | 9 |
About Thomas Nowell
Thomas Nowell is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Aging, Molecular Biology, Biochemistry and Oncology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 876 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Glycation End Products research (5 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (4 papers), Connexins and lens biology (3 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (3 papers), Redox biology and oxidative stress (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (2 papers) and Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (38 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (131 citations), Cell Biology (190 citations), Molecular Biology (679 citations) and Ophthalmology (79 citations). Thomas Nowell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Allen Taylor, Fu Shang, Martin S. Obin, Xin Gong, Jessica Jahngen-Hodge, Jeffrey B. Blumberg, Helen J. Palmer, Li Peng Huang, Donald E. Smith and Gayle Perrone. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Eye Research, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Current Eye Research and Advances in pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.