Thomas N. Bryce

55 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Thomas N. Bryce
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.0k
  • Rehabilitation 206
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 110
  • Pharmacology 313
  • Physiology 373
Replace John L. K. Kramer with:
John L. K. Kramer Canada
Susan B. Rutkowski Australia
Cecilia Norrbrink Sweden
Ellen Merete Hagen Norway
Jill M. Wecht United States
I L Johannesen Denmark
Karen Ethans Canada
Cecilia Norrbrink Budh Sweden
Paul G. Loubser United States
Milan P. Stojanovic United States
Thomas N. Bryce relative to John L. K. Kramer Canada John L. K. Kramer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
John L. K. Kramer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas N. Bryce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas N. Bryce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas N. Bryce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas N. Bryce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas N. Bryce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas N. Bryce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas N. Bryce. The network helps show where Thomas N. Bryce may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas N. Bryce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas N. Bryce Line = papers co-authored together Thomas N. Bryce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011234
2
Prevalence of chronic pain after traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review.
2009171
3
2009162
4 2008161
5 2007155
6 2015152
7 2018131
8 2014131
9 200481
10 200069
11 201254
12 201142
13 201437
14 201635
15 201433
16 200130
17 201527
18 201826
19 200625
20 200624

About Thomas N. Bryce

Thomas N. Bryce is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Pharmacology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 59 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (42 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (8 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (3 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (3 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers) and Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.0k citations), Rehabilitation (206 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (110 citations), Pharmacology (313 citations) and Physiology (373 citations). Thomas N. Bryce has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Marcel Dijkers, Jeanne M. Zanca, J. S. Richards, Nanna Brix Finnerup, Philip J. Siddall, Eva Widerström-Noga, Allan J. Kozlowski, Fin Biering‐Sørensen, Kristjan T. Ragnarsson and Diana D. Cardenas. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spinal Cord, Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, Journal of Neurotrauma and PM&R.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact