Thomas Most

630 citations
23 papers · 474 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Most

19 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

Thomas Most
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 210
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 269
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 90
  • Mechanics of Materials 160
  • Computational Mechanics 68
Replace Tong Guo with:
Tong Guo China
Hyun‐Moo Koh South Korea
Michel Fogli France
Rengui Bi China
Christian A. Schenk Austria
Mansour Bagheri Iran
F.A. DiazDelaO United Kingdom
Changqing Gong United States
Janusz Murzewski Poland
Thiagarajan Krishnamurthy United States
Thomas Most relative to Tong Guo China Tong Guo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Tong Guo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Most

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Most's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Most with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Most more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Most

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Most. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Most. The network helps show where Thomas Most may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Most, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Most Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Most links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007139
2 200565
3 200949
4 201139
5 200836
6 200632
7 200618
8 201018
9 200617
10 200417
11 201016
12 200613
13 20096
14 20013
15 20062
16 20231
17 20091
18 20111
19 20101
20 20250

About Thomas Most

Thomas Most is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, General Health Professions and Computational Mechanics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 474 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (12 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (7 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (4 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (4 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (3 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (3 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (3 papers) and Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (210 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (269 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (90 citations), Mechanics of Materials (160 citations) and Computational Mechanics (68 citations). Thomas Most has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Christian Bucher, Jörg F. Unger, Volkmar Zabel, Sebastian Wolff and Hideaki Ishii. Their work appears in journals such as Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Computers & Structures and Computers and Geotechnics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact