Thomas Most

639 citations
24 papers · 480 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Most

20 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers

Thomas Most
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 210
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 273
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 90
  • Mechanics of Materials 164
  • Computational Mechanics 69
Replace Michel Fogli with:
Michel Fogli France
Christian A. Schenk Austria
Hyuk-Chun Noh South Korea
Mansour Bagheri Iran
Rengui Bi China
Francisco Alejandro DiazDelaO United Kingdom
Changqing Gong United States
R. Stocki Poland
N. Impollonia Italy
Giuseppe Abbiati Italy
Thomas Most relative to Michel Fogli France Michel Fogli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Michel Fogli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Most

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Most's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Most with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Most more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Most

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Most. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Most. The network helps show where Thomas Most may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Most, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Most Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Most links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007140
2 200567
3 200949
4 201138
5 200837
6 200633
7 200619
8 201018
9 200417
10 200617
11 201016
12 200613
13 20096
14 20013
15 20062
16 20251
17 20231
18 20101
19 20111
20 20091

About Thomas Most

Thomas Most is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Philosophy, having authored 24 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (12 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (7 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (4 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (4 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis (3 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (3 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (3 papers) and Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (210 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (273 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (90 citations), Mechanics of Materials (164 citations) and Computational Mechanics (69 citations). Thomas Most has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Christian G. Bucher, Sebastian Wolff, Volkmar Zabel, Jörg F. Unger and Hideaki Ishii. Their work appears in journals such as Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Applied Sciences, Journal of Sound and Vibration and European Journal of Control.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact