Thomas Michl

658 citations
47 papers · 331 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Michl

43 papers receiving 279 citations

Peers

Thomas Michl
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 230
  • Economics and Econometrics 268
  • Finance 33
  • Sociology and Political Science 95
  • Accounting 12
Replace Laura Carvalho with:
Laura Carvalho Brazil
Maximiliano Dvorkin United States
Antonella Stirati Italy
Jim Dolmas United States
Hâle Utar United States
Robert Leeson Australia
Reshad N. Ahsan Australia
Carlos Usabiaga Spain
Weicheng Lian United States
Nicolas Dromel France
Thomas Michl relative to Laura Carvalho Brazil Laura Carvalho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Laura Carvalho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Michl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Michl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Michl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Michl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Michl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Michl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Michl. The network helps show where Thomas Michl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Michl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Michl Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Michl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199932
2 200028
3 198527
4 198824
5 200422
6 200920
7 200916
8 199114
9 201712
10 20169
11 19918
12 19948
13 20188
14 20218
15 20007
16 20086
17 20195
18 19875
19 20205
20 19875

About Thomas Michl

Thomas Michl is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Sociology and Political Science, Finance and Accounting, having authored 47 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Policy (32 papers), Economic theories and models (23 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (11 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (8 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (5 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (5 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (3 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (230 citations), Economics and Econometrics (268 citations), Finance (33 citations), Sociology and Political Science (95 citations) and Accounting (12 citations). Thomas Michl has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Duncan K. Foley, Daniele Tavani, Jonathon Mote, Robert J. Gordon, Daniel E. Sichel, Stephen D. Oliner and Robert Rowthorn. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Radical Political Economics, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Review of Keynesian Economics, Review of Political Economy and Metroeconomica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact